Prophecies Happening NOW
EUGENICS, ABORTION & GENOCIDE

Genocide

COVID-19 Genocide of 2020

10 Stages of Genocide

WEF Adviser Yuval Harari: ‘We Just Don’t Need the Vast Majority of the Population’ in Today’s World

Georgia Guidestones

The Georgia Guide Stones and the Ten Commandments of the Coming Antichrist

The Secret Covenant To Kill Off Humanity (OP Freedom)

EUGENICIST BILL GATES (Progressive Truth Seekers )

Eugenics, If You Think That This Ended With Hitler – Think Again :: by Geri Ungurean

https://www.raptureready.com/2015/11/10/eugenics-think-ended-hitler-think-geri-ungurean/

Medical technology can be a wonderful thing. It has given the world hope when their joints have worn out. We have seen organ replacement surgeries which significantly prolong a person’s life.

But, as with anything else in this fallen world, technology can and is being used in nefarious ways. In my research, I’ve discovered plans to use medical technology in ways which sound like something from a science fiction novel. I wish that it was “fiction” but it’s real. I have written articles on the United Nations and their 2030 and Agenda 21 Initiatives for a “perfect world.” One of the criteria which is not openly discussed is massive depopulation of the earth.

By mid 2016, the world’s population will reach 7.4 Billion. The goal of the elites and of the U.N. is to substantially decrease the population. The magic number? That would be 500 million. Is that substantial enough for you? It is shocking to me, and makes the mass murdering by Hitler pale in comparison.

I wrote an article about the Georgia Guide Stones. On this structure is articulated the ten commandments of the Antichrist. They even carved in a sustainable population for the earth: 500 million. Here is the article: The Georgia Guide Stones and the Ten Commandments of the Coming Antichrist

From Creating an Elite Class of Super Humans

“This is the first part of a two part series exploring the relationship between the controversial eugenics movement of the past and modern genetics. Eugenics was dedicated to cleansing and purifying humanity from “inferior” members with the hope of solving various social problems related to poverty, disability, and illness. To accomplish this, it sought to create a superior race of people and to use forced sterilization and extermination to eliminate future generations of defective human beings. Darwin’s theory of evolution was used to justify the practice of eugenics. Later, when eugenics fell from favor, modern genetics began to grow up from the ashes of the former movement.

When Adolf Hitler applied Darwin’s theory of evolution and the principles of eugenics to the goals of the German state, the result was the murder of eleven million men, women and children. These lives were sacrificed in the name of eugenics. Eugenicists were seeking to improve the conditions of life for humanity by creating a “superior” race of people.

When we compare the way eugenicists view the people on our planet, with the way that God views these same people, it truly brings the evil of eugenics into clear view. There is no gray area here – it is good vs. evil:

“The Lord thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; he will save, he will rejoice over thee with joy; he will rest in his love, he will joy over thee with singing” (Zephaniah 3:17)

God loves each and every one of us. He rejoices over everyone of us with singing! The Creator of the Universe loves us that much. He doesn’t look at our economic status, or whether we have grave illnesses which run in our families. He doesn’t see us as having “defects.” He loves us with an everlasting love.

Creating an Elite Class of Super Humans goes on:

The eugenics movement had a very dark side, which led to social control, loss of reproductive freedom, and the loss of life. Should we be concerned that modern genetic science might have a dark side as well? Will the fruit of genetic research be misused by ill-intentioned people to gain control over others as happened with eugenics in the past? Has modern genetics completely severed itself from its roots? Or, might it become the tool that will be used to try to create a master class of genetically superior human beings in America?

What are the deceptions and dangers of the modern genetics movement? Does true health and true happiness lie in the human genome? Are we really bound to the set of genes that we received from our parents, or can we overcome what we were given? What are the factors that activate or deactivate certain genes, and how can we control the expression of our genetic make-up to promote our health and the health of our children? What are the motivations of certain groups who want us to believe that genes control every aspect of our lives – that we have no other options than to suffer while genetic scientists look for genetic cures for all that ails us? Are we really more than our genes or is our genetic code all there is?

The article which I am using as a reference in this piece is quite long, but amazingly thorough, and the best article I’ve seen on the subject of eugenics. I encourage each and every one of you to view this article in its entirety. I could go on and post excerpts from it, but honestly it is just too long – not in a negative way – it is an exhaustive expose on the eugenics movement.

I have decided to list the topics spoken of in the Health Impact News article (with a blurb expanding on the section), in hopes that you will read the article and be informed as to what is happening in the world of eugenics. Be ready to be shocked:

1. Eugenics in a nutshell

“The word Eugenics means “good genes.” Eugenicists believe that principles of Darwin’s theory regarding “the survival of the fittest” can be used to support the elimination of weak and undesirable people from society. They believe that human beings are inherently no different than animals, and therefore we can and should be bred like animals. A farmer does not allow deficient cows in his herd to reproduce, and in the same way, eugenicists believe that certain people in our society should control human reproduction.”

2. Children Up to the Age of Five is Another Option

People now believe that if parents decide that they wish to have the life of their child brought to an end before age five, because of disability, illness, inconvenience of the parents, or for any other reason, then the parents should have the right to abort the child. So, if you don’t like the color of his hair, the color of her eyes, the developmental delays that you are observing, the illnesses that are making life difficult, or the behaviors that you cannot control, then you should have the right to have your child aborted (legally killed) up to age 5 or 6

3. “Modern” Thinking is Simply the Old Eugenics Resurfacing as “Science”

“The idea that people in authority should have the legal right to terminate the lives of other people in certain circumstances to benefit the greater good of society is not new. These thoughts have a long history, which was part of the original eugenics movement that began in 1859. The human extermination program that was implemented by Adolf Hitler before and during World War II was a prime example of eugenics. He was trying to purify the human race by killing all those who he determined would have an inferior contribution to the human germplasm if they were to reproduce. He and other leaders of the Third Reich believed that only superior human beings should be allowed to reproduce, and the inferior should be eliminated."

4. What do Eugenicists Desire?

“Eugenicists seek to create a class of people who possess superior attributes such as intelligence, physical strength, and physical appearance. They also seek to discourage reproduction by “inferior” people.When techniques of discouragement fail to reduce the birth of new “defectives,” then forced sterilization of undesirables is pursued under the authority of the state. When sterilization is not practical, then termination of life is used to decrease the surplus population of defectives.”

5. Francis Galton – the First Major Leader in the Eugenics

Australian researcher and writer Roger Sandall described how Francis Galton’s life was transformed by the theory of Darwinian evolution. Roger Sandall wrote:

Coming at a critical stage of both his scientific career and his domestic life, Darwin’s book shattered Galton’s religious beliefs and turned him towards biological research. He always had what he called “a hereditary bent of mind”, and from 1859 he proceeded to investigate, he said later, matters “clustered round the central topics of Heredity and the possible improvement of the Human Race.”

6. Creating an Elite Class of Super Humans

“Proponents of eugenics believe that a pure bloodline should be created that contains only the best traits of humanity. They believe that techniques of good breeding should be used to create a race of super humans who are made in the image of the eugenicists. These super humans will all be highly intelligent, strong, healthy, beautiful, talented, prosperous, motivated, and capable of submitting their will to the will and greater good of society.

7.”The Horrors of Eugenics

“Forced Sterilization in the U.S. Upheld by the Supreme Court – In the early 1900s, eugenicists began to use persuasion to gain voluntary cooperation with their new way of thinking about human reproduction. In the United States, the strategy of persuasion was eventually replaced by a strategy of coercion and compulsion.

In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the State of Virginia’s sterilization plan in Buck Versus Bell, which affirmed that it had the right to sterilize mentally deficient residents to prevent them from “producing more of their kind.” This decision opened the door to forced sterilization in many U.S. states.”

8. The Family is not Compatible with the Practice of Eugenics

“Eugenicists also will seek to destroy the family structure in order to accomplish their goals. The value and functioning of the family unit consisting of a husband/father, wife/mother and numerous children will be attacked on every front.

This is necessary to break the emotional bonds that tie family members together, and replace it with zealous allegiance to the state. Commitment to the power of the state must be stronger than love and commitment to family members so that defectives in the family can be sterilized or removed without a struggle.”

9. The Existence of God is not Compatible with Eugenics

“There must also be a breaking of affection and commitment to God. Eugenics is incompatible with true religion. Eugenics and the power of the state must rule over people and not the God of the Bible.

Eugenicists understand that one can only serve one master, and their master must be the god and religion of Darwinian Evolution. The moral absolutes of conservative biblical Christianity stand in direct opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution and the full implementation of eugenic techniques.

The belief that life is a gift from God, and should be cherished and preserved, is incompatible with the outworking of eugenics, which seeks to put life under the authority of a superior class of people and under the authority of the state.”

10. Who is Superior and Who is Not

“This question is the key to understanding eugenics. It is also the key for uncovering the deceptions and lies that are used to justify eugenics as a socially advanced way of managing society.

Adolf Hitler and his colleagues decided that it was the Nordic or Aryan bloodlines that were superior to all other bloodlines on the Earth. Thus, Adolf Hitler and others like him were to become the superior bloodline. Those with similar physical characteristics/appearance, emotional functioning, and mental capacities, and those who possessed certain ideological convictions were to become archetypes of humanity. They were to be raised up above all other people and others were to be brought into subjection to them.”

11. Conclusion: Where is Modern Genetics Leading Us?

“If our tolerance for the termination of life in the United States continues to increase, then expanded opportunities to take life will follow. Who will be the next group of “defectives” who will be targeted for either repair or extermination? Perhaps it will be people whose only “defect” is that they are poor, are aliens, or are strangers to us and just don’t seem to fit in with social norms.

People may no longer call themselves eugenicists, but the desire to perfect humanity and create a “better” people remains a strong desire in the hearts and minds of many scientists, politicians, and corporations. Many people have never heard the word eugenics, nevertheless, their grumbling words condemn those they do not like. They speak against the existence of certain groups in society and speak about how things would be better if someone would do something about “those people.” Those who refuse vaccines today, for example, are considered a threat to society, and mandatory vaccine laws are being proposed in many states in 2015.

Will modern genetics respond to the grumblers among us, and be the tool that politicians ultimately use to fix the problems in our society? Will its advances be the stimulus that justifies the termination of healthy, but undesirable people in our society? Will modern genetics become the eugenics of our times? What is the dark side of genetics and how is it being used by corporations to create a new class of people in America? These questions and many others regarding modern genetics will be explored in the next article in this series.”

Brethren, this is what is coming to this earth. It is important for us to know what lies ahead.

But the most important thing is to remember how blessed we are to belong to our Lord Jesus! He is not surprised by any of this. He is omniscient. He is God.

Let us pray together for this fallen world. Let us also pray for the return of our King Jesus to gather His own unto Himself and take us to our real home in heaven.

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA

grandmageri422@gmail.com

Eugenics, If You Think That This Ended With Hitler

Bill Gates, His Father and Eugenics :: By Geri Ungurean

https://www.raptureready.com/2020/12/29/bill-gates-his-father-and-eugenics-by-geri-ungurean/

We have read articles ad nauseam about Covid-19 and the coming vaccines. But we must understand the man, Bill Gates, and his father to fully appreciate what is happening in our world. It will help you to understand the agenda of these people.

And it will also help you in making a decision to receive the vaccine or not.

Their agenda is NOT about helping people with vaccines.

The agenda is world depopulation through sterilization.

From crazzfiles.com - The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19. In the following, Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Sr. and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.

THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT

In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton, in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, coined the term ‘eugenics.’

Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits.

Decades of research on ‘controlled breeding,’ including through means of sterilization, soon became accepted mainstream science at the turn of the century, and the eugenics movement was born.

Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.

Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits,’ and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.

As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanize what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives.”

Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour, and a new change was needed to continue.

CULTURAL MARXISM

The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II; rather, they went underground and/or were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises.

Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.

During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive,’ with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.

The Rockefeller Foundation heavily financed the modern eugenics movement and think-tanks such as the Tavistock Institute would give birth to many influential individuals and ‘social’ organizations.

Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularization of birth control, the decriminalization of homosexuality, and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernization.”

The basic premise remained the same; however, it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.

These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.

A plethora of new-age organizations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture,’ and this ‘progression’ continued; the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.

BILL GATES SR. AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD

The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.

Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr., was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organization boards, and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.

Importantly, Gates Sr. served on the board of Planned Parenthood (PP) during the group’s infancy — a re-branded organization birthed out of the American Eugenics Society.

The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today becoming one of the largest organizations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co.; BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.

Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing.

In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice,’ yet it is a eugenics front organization in disguise.

Planned Parenthood has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.

Does this sound like a group that is dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.

Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders.”

Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.

THE GATES FOUNDATION

William Gates Sr. would continue his eugenicist efforts by becoming instrumental in the formation of a new philanthropic brainchild called the William H. Gates Foundation in 1994.

The group, like Planned Parenthood, would first focus on ‘improving’ reproductive and child health in the developing world. After pioneering philanthropist activities, the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.

The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement; however, the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF.

Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavors.

The organization is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine, and now agriculture.

In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.

The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.

Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work.” She has been openly criticized for these moves.

In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning,’ with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.

This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking.

The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.

Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.

BILL GATES AND VACCINES

Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.

He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market,’ and then dominating that market.

In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.

Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.

He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:

Source: B&MGF

Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:

Adaptive trial designs.
Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines.
Novel delivery formats for vaccines.
Modular, automated manufacturing platforms enabling small-batch vaccine production.

The billionaire was an early investing partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunization.

Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments (including Australia), the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.

Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.

Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.

COVID-19: A PLAN-DEMIC? ‘PREDICTING’ AN OUTBREAK

The Microsoft co-founder has hinted on multiple occasions over the past decade that the potential for something like the coronavirus that would soon arise and the world must be ‘ready.’

In 2015, Bill Gates gave a TED Talk titled The next outbreak? We’re not ready, which is being shared widely online in recent weeks given the impact of COVID-19 across the world.

The part of the talk that’s making rounds online shows Gates explaining that while the greatest threat to humanity when he was growing up was nuclear war, the greatest threat now is a virus:

“If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”

However, as we have explored, there is no fundamental evidence to suggest a threat from the CoronaHoax, which has been invented as a means to usher in further mechanisms of control.

Rather, through these ‘cryptic’ messages, Gates was positioning himself in a positive light to connect with the public psyche. If something was to happen, ‘Gates would know the solution!’, they will cry.

Did Gates know something we didn’t know in advance? Emerging evidence suggest this ‘pandemic’ was foretold by the billionaire, which now serves as the mechanism to further carry out the agenda.

EVENT 201

On October 18, 2019, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, which is described on the group’s website as “a high-level pandemic exercise” carried out in New York.

The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be ‘necessary’ during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences:

“Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global — a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences.

A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201,’ would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”

The group claims they did not ‘predict’ the coronavirus, despite modelling their pandemic under the same name. However, when examining their documents, striking similarities begin to emerge:

“Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen was modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year.”

Let’s think: The ‘real’ coronavirus started over a bat in a meat market, transmitted to humans and shows mild symptoms. The vaccine is also 12-18 months away from being developed.

Furthermore, the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation funded a research center in England called the Pirbright Institute, which specializes in the study of viruses that affect farm animals, and viruses which transfer from animals to people. They own a very similar patent for a type of coronavirus affecting animals.

The world fell for the deception, hook line and sinker. Now, nations are crying out for a ‘solution’ to the growing COVID-19 ‘crisis,’ and Bill Gates (not surprisingly) has emerged at the head of the pack.

GATES TO THE RESCUE

Bill Gates is now the talk of the town, and in a recent interview, he told The Daily Show that his foundation was funding the construction of factories for seven coronavirus vaccine ‘candidates.’

He says the foundation would end up picking only one or two of the seven, meaning billions of dollars spent on manufacturing would be abandoned. However, spending a few billion to capitalize on the growing $35 billion vaccine market seems like a calculated investment.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already committed $100 million to fighting coronavirus as part of its broader efforts in international health. The group is also reportedly exploring the idea of supplying at-home testing kits for the coronavirus.

It also launched a $125 million COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator and gave $5 million to help public health agencies in the Seattle area ‘enhance their capacity’ to detect the virus.

So, a man who has profited largely off vaccine development for years and also held ‘simulations’ of pandemic outbreaks is now cashing in on the chase to develop a COVID-19 vaccine? How fitting.

Gates ultimate influence in this unfolding plan can be found in the instructions given in recent weeks.

THE ‘ONLY WAY OUT’

Bill Gates now has a net worth of $97.8 billion. Yet, being the ‘relatable’ person that he is, he took to reddit for an Ask Me Anything on the COVID-19 pandemic. He would share his thoughts on ‘how best to deal’ with the outbreak and explored possible long-term effects on the world.

Gates said that broad vaccination for COVID-19 will need to become available “before you can be completely safe.” Until then, according to his claims, there’s a risk that communities could rebound unless they continue to practice strict social distancing and quarantines to see case numbers level off.

Gates said he doesn’t think large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place, as the ‘risks would outweigh the benefits’ of such events.

World leaders also agree with Gates’ timeline and perspectives. Shortly after doing the media rounds, the Australian government hinted at the fact society will be in lockdown until a vaccine is developed. This was soon followed by the New South Wales government and others.

Furthermore, Gates called for a “national tracking system similar to South Korea,” saying that “in Seattle, the University of Washington is providing thousands of tests per day, but no one is connected to a national tracking system.” He said that whenever there is a positive test, it should be used to understand where the disease is and whether we need to strengthen the social distancing.

In the future, he has floated the idea of ‘vaccine certificates’ to show proof-of-vaccination following the widespread rollout of COVID-19 products. This would be a new requirement for international and domestic travel, and is tipped to further expand to all facets of life.

Given the context detailed in this feature piece, do you trust the intentions of this man?

Gates has a rich history of eugenics influence and partakes in activities across the world that further progress the aims of the original movement, albeit in disguise.

Such is the story of the Dehumanization of Humanity. The ‘death of god’ lead to parasites believing they were gods, and this premise serves as the underlying force driving the transhumanist era.

Using objectivist logic, we must all exercise the precautionary principle when approaching Gates’ claims to ‘improve’ health through vaccines.

If a COVID-19 vaccine uses strains of an actual virus, as many do, in order to encourage the body to build immunization, subjects who receive the vaccine will be carriers of that virus.

Bill Gates, and the forces that drive this puppet, are pushing the world towards a choice: Take the COVID-19 vaccine and deal with the health consequences, or refuse and be denied basic services and be labelled as a ‘health threat.’ Take the jab or be targeted.

I know where I stand.

Will you be lining up to receive the newly developed Gates-funded vaccine?

Stay tuned for more….

Source

Brethren, this is shocking, but you must see it.

From tpchronicles.com. By The Pastors Chronicles – December 8, 2018

Billionaire Bill Gates really likes helping people from poor countries get vaccinated. But many are saying his motives may not be all that pure. In fact, many believe that this globalist, along with the United Nations, is conducting a massive depopulation effort.

People on the left and the 0.001% love to talk about how all the people on the right are racists and hate poor countries. But it would seem that this is all just a cover-up for what the globalists leading the “progressive” left are actually doing to people of color.

The scandal first started to break when Agriq-Quest Ltd, a Nairobi based pharmaceutical company, got into a heated dispute with the Kenyan Ministry of Health over the vacancies they were giving young women. These vaccines were innocent enough sounding in and of themselves, but what was being found added to them was a completely different story.

Billionaire globalists like Bill and Melinda Gates claim that people in Africa and other poor countries not getting vaccinated is very upsetting. And in the case of Kenya, downright “infuriating.” As Melinda Gates puts it, resistance to vaccinations “makes me angry.”

But those who really should be angry are the Kenyan people being taken advantage of by big money pharmaceutical companies and the globalists patronizing these morally debauched conglomerates.

500,000 Kenyan women and children are undergone forced sterilization as part of world “health organizations” issuing vaccinations through the government.

That is what should be making Mrs. Gates angry. Instead, it is women using their voice and saying “we don’t want to be forced to not have children against our will” that makes her mad.

It all started back in 2016 when the Catholic Church began to warn that what happened in the Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico was happening yet again in Kenya.

Kenya’s opposition leader Raila Odinga—who swore himself in as president on Tuesday—claimed that at least 500,000 young girls and women may be infertile, following a tetanus vaccine administered by the government in 2014 and 2015.

The controversy began coming to a head in 2016 when Agri-quest Ltd, a Nairobi-based pharmaceutical company, got in a dispute with Kenya’s ministry of health over their tetanus and polio vaccinations. A group of Catholic doctors originally made the accusations claiming that the vaccines may contain a hormone that is dangerous to young women and can cause potential sterilization.

as the Agence de Presse Africaine reported:

Odinga said girls and women aged between 14 and 49 from the fastest growing populations in the country will not have children because of a state-sponsored sterilization exercise that was sold to the country as a tetanus vaccination.

The Catholic church was ignored when it mounted a strong but lonely campaign against the mass tetanus vaccination after it raised concerns about the safety of the vaccine that was being used, he said.

At the time, the Catholic church in Kenya claimed that the tetanus vaccine used by the government of Kenya and UN agencies was contaminated with a hormone (HCG) that can cause miscarriages and render some women sterile.

The Catholic Church was right. The pharmaceutical company paid to create these laced vaccinations has had their license removed.

Read rest of story HERE.

This is just one of many horror stories of the vaccines sent over to Third World countries by Bill Gates, laced with hormones which were purposely added to the vaccines to cause sterilizations.

Gates sent HPV vaccines to India, and thousands of girls fell ill – some of them were paralyzed. East Indian Scientists analyzed the components of the vaccines and found toxic substances. They filed a Lawsuit against Bill Gates, but nothing has come to fruition. When you are as rich as Bill and Melinda Gates, your attorneys can keep you safe from lawsuits.

Brethren, I felt that this article needed to be written. Many people are deciding if they will get the Covid 19 Vaccine or not. In light of the history of Eugenics, beginning with the father of Bill Gates and continuing with Bill Gates himself – this is more than a bit disconcerting. These people do not have your best interest at heart.

These are Eugenicists who believe that depopulation of the world is the only way for our world to be sustainable.

Me, my husband, daughter and our grandsons will NOT receive the vaccine.

God help us all.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

grandmageri422@gmail.com

Articles at grandmageri422.me

Bill Gates, His Father and Eugenics

The Hidden Agenda Of Genetic Manipulation (Engdahl, 2013)

Genetics is the new name of Eugenics. The GMO Project. Genocide.

https://pennybutler.com/seeds-genetic-manipulation/

“As I dug into the research of GMO and the patenting of seeds, I came across something that perked my ears up, and that was that the earliest research on GMO’s. was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation. That interested me tremendously because I have spent years researching the Rockefeller machine – the Political machine of the most powerful family in America after WWII, and what I found out astonished even me.” Engdahl Lectures on the cohort renaming of Eugenics to Genetics and that GMO = Population Control.

The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, F. William Engdahl

(Vrillex II)

F. William Engdahl is an American German freelance journalist, historian and economic researcher. "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" This lecture at the Open Mind Conference 2013, focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish its control over the very basis of human survival, the provision of our daily bread. Control the food and you control the people. This is no ordinary lecture about the perils of GMO.

Engdahl takes the audience inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms and reveals a World of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production. The lecture is based on Engdahls book "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" which is an eye-opener, a must-read for all those committed to the causes of social justice and World peace.

F. William Engdahl is an American German freelance journalist, historian and economic researcher. This lecture at the Open Mind Conference 2013, focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish its control over the very basis of human survival, the provision of our daily bread.

Control the food and you control the people. This is no ordinary lecture about the perils of GMO. Engdahl takes the audience inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms and reveals a World of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production.

The lecture is based on Engdahls book “Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation” 2007.
- Seeds Of Destruction By F. William Engdahl Review By Stephen Lendman – very detailed review – recommended read.
- Seeds Of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda Of Genetic Manipulation Review by GlobalResearch – Engdahl carefully documents how the intellectual foundations of ‘eugenics,’ mass culling of the sick, colored, and otherwise disposable races, were actually first established, and even legally approved, in the United States. Eugenics research was financially supported by the Rockefeller and other elite families and first tested on Jews under Nazi Germany.
- Browse/Read book on Issuu | Buy PDF

Notes, Links, Rough Transcript

I went back to the 1930’s and found that the Rockefellers had actually created an entire field of the study of biology. They created a fraudulent branch of biology called molecular-biology, based on a principle of scientific reductionism. They maintain that they could reduce the complexity of life to a single gene, and be able to shoot foreign matter into that gene and change the expression of that gene. The problem with this, is that it’s not stable among other things. Into the 40’s with it’s tax-free money was one of the few sources for scientific research in these Elite universities and they grabbed it up, and began promoting molecular biology. Then, right after the war, Nelson Rockefeller, took a scientist that worked for the Rockefeller University, down to Mexico to see about the possibilities of introducing a variety of wheat called ‘Wonder Wheat” and a green revolution was born. A lot of hype and lies.

The green revolution was aimed at creating “Agri-Business”. In the early 1950s, the Rockefeller Foundation financed a project that today dominates the human food chain around the world. Agribusiness. Almost 100% of the corn grown is genetically-manipulated, virtually all of the soy-beans in the world. Patented seeds largely from Monsanto. The business model is a corporate model. The idea of a farmer that gets up and cares about the health of his animals, gets up at 4am when one of his cows takes ill or something to find out what the problem is – that began to be transformed in the 1970’s into Industrialized farming – mass feed lots, where 10’s of 1000’s of animals are crowded together. They started with chickens, and by now it’s spread to virtually all of the meat that is consumed. It’s pumped up with antibiotics to make them grow faster, and then it’s fed a diet of GMO almost exclusively. It’s probably a good time to think about becoming a vegetarian. Virtually all of the power feed is GMO.

Monsanto Harvester of Fear. in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decision, turned seeds into widgets, laying the groundwork for a handful of corporations to begin taking control of the world’s food supply. In its decision, the court extended patent law to cover “a live human-made microorganism.” In this case, the organism wasn’t even a seed. Rather, it was a Pseudomonas bacterium developed by a General Electric scientist to clean up oil spills. But the precedent was set, and Monsanto took advantage of it.

The idea of GMO came from very powerful and evil people with a fascination with something called Eugenics – race-breeding science. You have a superior race, like the Rockefellers or Rothschilds (as they see it), and then you have the unwanted, the human cancer that spreads and reproduces. After the end of WWII, the Rockefellers became some of the largest finances of something called the American Eugenics Society, out of which came the Planned Parenthood Foundation, which is nothing but a disguised form of Eugenics, and during the 30’s, they created the Negro Project. “If the black ministers ever get wind of the Negro Project is about reducing the Negro population, then our project is in real trouble”. That was Eugenics.

They held a conference and announced the new name of Eugenics is Genetics, and that began this mad project to try to alter the gene – to manipulate the gene of life – by reducing the complexity of biological life, down to the single gene, and changing its expression. The same Rockefeller foundation, from the 1920s into the eve of the first World War, financed all of the Eugenics research, from the time that Hitler came into power until 1939 – research on how to eliminate “Useless Eaters”, “Undesirable”, “Gypsies”, “Jews” and so forth. Nazi doctors were all receiving money from the Rockefellers. This is the geo-political background to the GMO project.

Center for Genetics and Society Eugenics refers to beliefs and practices aimed at controlling reproduction in order to “improve” the characteristics of human populations. In the early 20th century, eugenic beliefs were intertwined with the developing science of genetics.
Is modern genetics the new eugenics?. Genet Med 5, 469–475 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000093978.77435.17

The 4 Rockefeller brothers divided the world up among them after the war, In the 50’s, John D Rockefeller created the Population Council. The purpose of the Population Council, was to reduce population. They hired demographers at Elite Universities to come up with scary numbers to terrify the population about how Indian people are reproducing like rabbits, and there’s famine because there’s “too many people in India” and so forth. Africa, China, they did the same thing. So that most of the world came to believe – especially in the Industrial world – that the greatest danger on earth today is “Over-Population” but, ‘don’t worry because the Rockefellers, through their Population Council, began funding all sorts of research in birth control devices’.

In the 1970s, Henry Kissinger was commissioned to do a top-secret study called NSSM 200, in the 1990’s, it was declassified and people could read it, but it became official US government policy to impose Population-Reduction on what Kissinger called “developing countries where they have rapid population growth and rich, raw material resources that the West needs to fight the Cold War – oil, metal, rare earth etc. Kissinger argued that these rapid population increases, will create a population that will demand their governments that they get a share of the pie, that they have an economic development – a good standard of living, adequate food, shelter and so forth. They made as a condition of any US government aid, that third world or developing countries, had to have a population plan in place.

Declassified Kissenger Report – National Security Study Memorandum ~ NSSM 200 – Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests – (The Kissenger Report, December 10, 1974) PDF

Gradually, the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund adopted (on US/Washington Pressure) these population-reduction policies, so they did not have to do it through the US government, they had plausible deniability. This is some of the background to the Rockefeller GMO Project.

Then they went to an Institute that the Rockefeller money had created called the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines, and financed the development of what they called “Golden Rice” because it was yellowish in colour, but the argument was that “we will develop rice that is genetically modified to contain Vitamin A, so that new-borns in poverty-areas of Asia would not have blindness that is caused by Vitamin A deficiency. After years of research, they developed their golden rice, is that a new-born would have to eat 8kg of golden rice everyday to get the amount of vitamin A that you get from carrots and other natural vegetables. So that project did not quite go the way the Rockefellers had dreamed.

Golden Rice – Greenpeace Southeast Asia

Then in the USA, Monsanto went to the Whitehouse in 1992 and convinced Bush that America had developed something that could make American Agriculture the World King – Patented Seeds, paired to Monsanto-chemicals. Monsanto had been in the orbit of the Rockefellers (a Rockefeller was on the board) since WWI making chemicals and Agent Orange and Dioxin and other such things. Bush agreed to issue instructions to the FDA, the NIH, and US Dept of Agriculture, that GMO corn and soy-beans look, smell, taste like the real thing, that we don’t need to do any independent studies whether it’s healthy for humans or animals, that it’s substantially equivalent. By putting the word “substantially” in there – you completely change the rules of the game. It’s not equivalent. It’s an unnatural transformation of normal seeds. That declaration by President Bush which has been reinforced by every single President – Bill Clinton, Baby Bush and now Barak Obama, that there is no Independent Testing of the Health and Safety of GMO.

Genetically Modified Food GMO the Great Scandal
U.S. Agent Orange/Dioxin Assistance to Vietnam Updated February 10, 2021 (PDF)
The British Medical Association (BMA) has asked for a Moratorium on GMO FOOD 1999 – The BMA believes that insufficient care has been taken with regards to public health and the introduction of GM crops to the UK. We believe there is a greater need for more comprehensive risk assessments which include interactions between GMOs and the long term effects on health and the environment before field trials are taken any further.
Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in digesta and tissues of sheep and pigs fed Roundup Ready canola meal. J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Mar 8;54(5):1699-709. doi: 10.1021/jf052459o. PMID: 16506822.
Science in Society # 37 – Spring 2008 Redeeming Science from Corporate Corruption (SiS 37), studies performed by, or on behalf of, companies claiming to show GM food is safe, and accepted by government regulators as such, do nothing of the kind. We are faced with a corporate corruption of science in which every level of the corporate structure is complicit: the scientific establishment, journal editors and big government held to ransom by the biotech industry.

Not only that, the GMO lobby – the companies themselves (Monsanto, etc) drafted the rules that became the agreement of Agriculture for something called the World Trade Organization in the 1990s. In those rules, if a country tries to stop Free-Trade in GMO Soy beans from Monsanto, from coming into the country, that they are in violation of WTO rules. The health and safety of a nation is deemed less important. The rules were very carefully written by very clever Monsanto lawyers so it looks like it’s protecting health and safety when it does quite the opposite. are written by very clever Monsanto lawyers

Documents made public from a lawsuit show that the overwhelming consensus among the FDA’s own scientists was that GM crops were inherently unsafe and could create hard-to-detect, unpredicted toxins, allergens, new diseases, and nutritional problems and had, in fact, urged their superiors to… Self-propagating genetic pollution will outlast, theoretically, the effects of global warming and nuclear waste. We have never had an experience like this before in our history.

The European Union had a problem in 2003. Whilst the FDA and Commissioners were happy to take Monsanto money under the table, the general public resisted these GMO’s, so Baby Bush decided to sue the European Union for not accepting more GMO in the EU. They partly won the suit, but still there has been no wide-spread acceptance of GMO in Europe. Austria forbids GMO. A number of countries in Europe also do not allow GMO.

The situation today is such, that virtually all the packaged-meat are GMO (unless you can verify that its come from a local farmer that has taken pains to feed non-GMO feed to his pigs, cattle or chickens).

The study documented, the scientists in France documented that the chemical that’s paired to the modified seeds – and you cannot buy Round-up Ready seeds without signing a contract that you’ll buy Roundup, which not only contains glyphosate, it contains proprietary chemicals which are not revealed to the public as to what they are, and Séralinis’ team, tested the chemicals, and found that these chemicals are toxic to cells in a human embryo, in quantities less than that recommended for garden-usage, and Roundup is the most common weed-killer in the world today. It’s a form of chemical warfare.

Ethoxylated adjuvants of glyphosate-based herbicides are active principles of human cell toxicity. Toxicology. 2013 Nov 16;313(2-3):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 21. PMID: 23000283.
- Study points to adjuvants working with glyphosate to cause a particularly lethal concoction.
Glyphosate commercial formulation causes cytotoxicity, oxidative effects, and apoptosis on human cells: differences with its active ingredient. Int J Toxicol. 2014 Jan-Feb;33(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/1091581813517906. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PMID: 24434723.
- “causing toxic effects on the human genome” “The glyphosate formulation studied also triggered two ‘death proteins’ in human cells known as caspase 3/7, inducing pathways that activate programmed cell death (apoptosis), a clear sign of significant toxicity.”
Roundup National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation (PDF) Very aggressive public relations and marketing by its developer, Monsanto, has resulted in the widespread belief that glyphosate is ‘safe’. Registration processes have generally supported this attitude, and there are no national or international bans. However, independent scientific studies and widespread poisonings in Latin America (resulting from aerial application) are beginning to reveal the true effects of glyphosate-based herbicides.
Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jun;113(6):716-20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7728. PMID: 15929894; PMCID: PMC1257596. Richard S, Moslemi S, Sipahutar H, Benachour N, Seralini GE.
Time- and dose-dependent effects of roundup on human embryonic and placental cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Jul;53(1):126-33. doi: 10.1007/s00244-006-0154-8. Epub 2007 May 4. PMID: 17486286.
- The cytotoxic, and potentially endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup are thus amplified with time. Taken together, these data suggest that Roundup exposure may affect human reproduction and fetal development in case of contamination. Chemical mixtures in formulations appear to be underestimated regarding their toxic or hormonal impact.
Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines. Toxicology. 2009 Aug 21;262(3):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jun 17. PMID: 19539684.
Glyphosate tolerant crops bring diseases and death .Science in Society 47.12-15, 2010.
Benachour & Seralini concluded “this work clearly confirms that the adjuvants in Roundup formulations are not inert” (Ho & Cherry 2009).
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5(7):706-726. doi:10.7150/ijbs.5.706. de Vendômois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, Séralini GE.
Why Glyphosate Should Be Banned – Institute of Science in Society Special Report

In 1999, Monsanto got into trouble with the project. Kissigner said back in the 70’s if you control oil, you control entire nations, and if you control food, you control the people.

Control what we eat, the toxins that build up in our system that 20-30 years later emerge as cancer or heart problems or other things that make us ineffective as live, thinking, active people that can make trouble for government policies that are destructive to us.

So in 1999, they announced that they are not only buying up all the Independent Seed companies around the world, but they were buying something called Delta and Pine Land – who in cooperation with the US gov’t, had developed a seed called Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT) or “Terminator Technology”.

Terminator Technology: Appraising Biotechnologists’ Claim to Feed the World

Terminator allows Monsanto to sell seeds to a farmer in India, China, or Africa and that seed will commit-suicide after one harvest, so you’re in a form of bondage that has never before been possible in the history of Agriculture. Farmers cannot re-plant a portion of the seeds for their next harvest – they completely lose their Independence to a foreign multinational, and on that basis alone:

even if GMO’s would increase harvest yield
even if it could be proven that GMO’s were completely safe to human and animal health (which they aren’t)
and even if they required less herbicide (which they don’t, they require more)

I would oppose GMO with all my energy because it’s controlled by 3-4 multi-nationals – chemical companies – and 3 of those are some of the most criminal corporations on the face of the earth. They developed Agent Orange, lied about the effects of it on their own employees to avoid paying liabilities, and the US govt has lied about it and not acknowledged the damage that American soldiers underwent from the toxic effects of working with Agent Orange during the war, and they did the same with Dioxin, with PCBs, dumping it into the water nearby their factories in the US. And these 3 corporations, which intimately work with the Pentagon and have for decades, on chemical-warfare – we are supposed to trust Monsanto, that they do the scientific studies that are given to the government, that the government doesn’t need to waste tax payer money doing independent scientific studies like Séralini did in France?

Genetics is the new name of Eugenics. The GMO Project. Genocide.

Epicyte September 2001. The world was preoccupied with other things, like planes flying into buildings. Epicyte did a press release saying that their spermicidal corn was the solution to over-population. He had developed corn, when eaten by a male, makes the sperm infertile, so you cannot conceive.

These are people who are out to reduce the population to several hundred million because they regard people as cancer. Epicyte disappeared as an independent company, it was bought up by North Carolina biotech company, but not before it signed licencing agreements with Dow chemical, Dow Agrisciences, another one of the GMO giants, to licence this spermicidal corn worldwide. For obvious political reasons, they’re keeping a low-profile on spermicidal corn, but it would be interesting to test to what extent the corn seed varieties has been contaminated with.

Epicyte: Contraceptive Corn | Genocide Food #NWOfood

Censored Important Videos

In 2001 scientists at the Epicyte bio-lab in San Diego created the ultimate GM crop—'contraceptive corn'—after researchers discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company has created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives.

Announcing his success at a press conference, the president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants and announced, "We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies."

Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. The company itself was taken over in 2004 by Biolex and nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn.

Some people say nobody in their right mind would do such a thing, would they? The problem is, there are people who are not in their right minds, and many of the most powerful, bad people on our planet, are not in their right minds, and they are doing this.

Together with the government of Norway and other foundation money, the Rockefellers spent years, in cooperation with the World UnHealthy Organization in Geneva, the WHO, developing a vaccine for Tetanus. They began giving free Vaccination in the early 1990s to women in Nicaragua, Mexico between the ages 14-45, but not to the men. Fortunately a Catholic Doctors Association became suspicious when the vaccine was only being offered to women of a child-bearing age, and took a sample of the vaccine to an independent laboratory and held a press conference announcing that it was laced with an abortifacient, that would cause a women who had conceived to abort. The WHO denied. The Catholic Doctors Association produced the lab-results, and WHO said “Oh, it must’ve been a bad batch, a contaminated batch”. This is what the GMO revolution is all about.

500,000 Kenyan women and children are undergone forced sterilization as part of world “health organizations” issuing vaccinations through the government.
HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World
Population control: The covert decades-long use of abortion-causing vaccines around the world
Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug. International / developing countries. Vaccine Wkly. 1995 May 29 – Jun 5:9-10. PMID: 12346214.

They’re not intended to improve the world. They’re intended to control. They can switch-off the seed-supply in a second without notice if say China didn’t do what Washington wanted. We’ve seen what Washington has done with the banking system – cutting off the oil sales of a country like Iran because they decide to.

Monsanto has teamed up with the Gates Foundation, being “great” Humanitarians introducing vaccines all over Africa – they have a project to vaccinate every child in Africa with various forms of poisons. Instead of spending 10 billion dollars on clean water supplies which would have a dramatic effect on sickness and death, they’re spending 10 billion on injecting every child in Africa with poisons called vaccines.

The Gates foundation has become a major shareholder in Monsanto and they also, together with the Rockefeller Foundation, two of the biggest private foundations of the world, sponsor something called the Green Revolution in Africa. The secretary-general of the United Nations for many years, Kofi Annan, was recruited by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller and company, to become the secretary of the Green Revolution in Africa. The project is to introduce GMO all across Africa by stealth, and many African countries are not as stupid as some white people think – they can actually read and write and read scientific reports on the internet and reject things that they think are unhealthy for them.

Bill Gates, David Rockefeller and Warren Buffet, issued an invitation to a group of the ten of the wealthiest people in America, to come to a meeting at the Rockefeller University’s presidents house in New York, to create something they call “The Good Club”. This was in the middle of the greatest financial crisis in human history, and one would think that these very wealthy, powerful people might be talking about “What can we do to avoid such financial crisis?” No, they didn’t care about that. They talked about how to solve the Human Population explosion – that was the most-pressing problem. Some have estimated that within 20-30 years, the greatest population problem we’ll have on this planet is a collapse of population-growth-rates – the demographic “Opposite” of what people in the Obama administration and virtually every US gov’t since Jimmy Carter’s day, have claimed as the “greatest problem facing mankind (this “over-population”).

On the advice of the Population Council of John D Rockefeller III, the Chinese government, 30 years ago, adopted the “one child policy“, so China is facing a demographic catastrophe in that within about 20 years, there will be 100 million Chinese males, with no statistical possibility of a female partner. Imagine the kind of unrest that that’s likely to cause.

I’m told by Chinese professors that Monsanto has come into Rural Areas of China and bribed local government officials to introduce GMO seeds. “

In 2008 we had a dramatic spike in world grain prices, rice & grains. At the same time there was a dramatic rise in the oil rise, over $140 a barrel. This was manipulated by the Wall St banks as they were trying to recoup the losses of the real estate debacle, and it was manipulated by the Bush administration by offering tax-payer subsidies to farmers to take land out of Agriculture cultivation and grow corn to “burn as fuel”.

40% of the corn harvest in the US in 2008 was being used for bio-fuels and that created a shortage on the world grain markets – harvest failures I believe because of drought in Russia and certain other grain belts of the Ukraine, but the price of grains went soaring through the roof.

It commissioned on Pontifical Academy of Science – there are 5 Pontifical Academies of Science in the Vatican – the academy has on it’s advisors, well-known & respectable scientists around the world, the problem is, they are not always ‘honest’ scientists. The Pontifical Academy of Science decided to give GMO the green light and the Vatican as an official policy had resisted GMO up until that time, but they got an ailing pope (or thought they had an ailing pope) to be convinced of the benefit of GMO to solve World Hunger.

Even though Pope’s are supposed to be infalliable, that he doesn’t have time to do original research on the scientific validity of GMO of such issues, so he relies on expert advice. The head of this Pontifical Academy gave a Press Conference and he said “GMO’s are perfectly fine for humans, this is rubbish that they have a bad effect on our health – I know because I was Pontifical representative for the Vatican at the United Nations in New York for 8 years, and I ate GMO all the time, and look at me, I’m fine!”. Talk about an idiot.

Political manipulation, because the US Govt pushes this poison as ‘active policy’ as Wikileaks demonstrated with the Ambassador to France pushing Monsanto.

Wikileaks cable reveals U.S. conspired to retaliate against European nations if they resisted GMOs – Health Ranger Commentary, 2010 – PDF
The former United States ambassador to France suggested “moving to retaliation” against France and the European Union (EU) in late 2007 to fight a French ban on Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) corn and changes in European policy toward biotech crops, according to a cable released by WikiLeaks.
U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks reveal the Bush administration drew up ways to retaliate against Europe for refusing to use genetically modified seeds. In 2007, then-U.S. ambassador to France Craig Stapleton was concerned about France’s decision to ban cultivation of genetically modified corn produced by biotech giant Monsanto. He also warned that a new French environmental review standard could spread anti-biotech policy across Europe. We speak with Jeffrey Smith of the Institute for Responsible Technology.
Leaked Cable: US to Start ‘Trade Wars’ with Nations Opposed to Monsanto, GMO Crops – The United States is threatening nations who oppose Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) crops with military-style trade wars, according to information obtained and released by the organization WikiLeaks. Nations like France, which have moved to ban one of Monsanto’s GM corn varieties, were requested to be ‘penalized’ by the United States for opposing Monsanto and genetically modified foods. The information reveals just how deep Monsanto’s roots have penetrated key positions within the United States government, with the cables reporting that many U.S. diplomats work directly for Monsanto.

The Pope was invited to the Food & Agriculture Conference in Rome, and it was believed by the organisers (by the US Government and others), that the Pope had been convinced by this Pontifical Academy to give the holy blessing to GMO to solve World Hunger. Which it won’t – quite the opposite. Something happened, and the secretary of a second Pontifical Academy had been given a copy of my book by a priest in Baltimore, Maryland who knew him personally, and the priest in Baltimore, told the secretary “I don’t recommend you read this book, I order you to read this book. You must read this, it is extremely important”.

To my knowledge, my book is the only book that talks about GMO as a conscious genocide project. Other excellent books took about the health risks of GMO and various things, but this is the only geo-political analysis in the world so far as I know, about the dangers of GMO.

So the secretary of the Pontifical Academy of Life got an audience with the Pope, one on one, and briefed him on the real truth about GMO. Well, the next week came this World Hunger Conference, and the Pope appeared as a speaker as was planned, and said not a single word about approving GMO. So the US Ambassador was blue with rage but there was nothing he could do – the Pope refused to sanction GMO. He even gave an Easter Sermon where he said “These are men playing with genetics, these are men who are playing at being God, but aren’t.” So he had gotten the point quite nicely. You cannot control life in this way, but the Rockefellers are obsessive psychopaths, and they don’t give up so easily.

At this point, the GMO lobby had been badly wounded by March Against Monsanto campaign. They are not by any means dead, they still held the patents, they still have a US Supreme Court that’s allowed patents on life to stand in court – something that ought to be prohibited in every country on earth – and they are trying to spread GMO in countries where they think they can bribe officials more easily, like China, Africa, India, but there are revolts appearing in all these countries.

So the perspective is by no means bleak, but we should know exactly what it is that has been done to poison us, our children, and grandchildren, and take the requisite measures to change that, thank you.

F. William Engdahl In The Vatican (Seeds of Destruction) Lecture

The Irish Sentinel

Engdahl also wrote two important books - "A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order" in 2004. It's an essential history of geopolitics and the importance of oil. Engdahl explains that America's post-WW II dominance rests on two pillars and one commodity - unchallengeable military power and the dollar as the world's reserve currency combined with the quest to control global oil and other energy resources.

Engdahl's newest book is just out from Global Research: "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" and subject of this review. It's the diabolical story of how Washington and four Anglo-American agribusiness giants plan world domination by patenting life forms to gain worldwide control of our food supply and why that prospect is chilling. The book's compelling contents are reviewed below in-depth so readers will know the type future Henry Kissinger had in mind in 1970 when he said: "Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people."

Remember also, this cabal is one of many interconnected ones with fearsome power and ruthless intent to use it - Big Banks controlling the Federal Reserve and our money,

The Hidden Agenda Of Genetic Manipulation

Insects As Flying Syringes For Genetic Modification, Eugenics And Population Control

https://www.technocracy.news/insects-as-flying-syringes-for-genetic-modification-eugenics-and-population-control/

Source: www.darpa.mil/news-events/2016-10-19

POSTED BY: TESSA LENA VIA MERCOLA.COM JULY 28, 2022

My presentation for the Crimes Against Humanity Task Force documents and explains the history behind “the takeover of all genetic material on earth”. The manipulation of life on earth is an old dream but technology has now provided the means to accomplish it, and Technocrat/Transhuman scientists are working day and night to change the world’s DNA. My forthcoming book, The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism, will connect all the dots to this mad program. It is being serialized on https://patrickwood.substack.com/⁃ TN Editor

"Voices from DARPA" Podcast, Episode 6: The Insectophile

(DARPAtv)

Blake Bextine of the Agency’s Biological Technologies Office talks about his virus- and insect-mediated vision for protecting food crops from natural and human-wrought threats, including drought and biological warfare. With his Insect Allies program, Bextine aims to increase food security by recruiting insects to deliver viruses, which have been modified to bear protective genes, into plants where those virus-carried genes could save the plants from the threats they face. He also shares ideas about a future with more insects on the menu to feed the many more mouths that likely will be on the planet.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Irresponsible use of new and very advanced technologies by the military is life-threatening
Engineered viruses can be used to edit genes in a target species, including in a heritable manner
“Insect Allies” is a DARPA program designed to genetically modify mature plants in a live environment by releasing insects infected with genetically modified viruses
Some scientists, although on board with genetic modification in principle, are questioning DARPA’s motives and raising concerns
Researchers in Singapore, as well as DARPA in the U.S. have developed “remote-controlled insects”

BREAKING NEWS: The craziest crazies have somehow escaped the asylum and installed themselves in high positions of power. Insane, they are coming up with one bad idea after another and barking orders at us, mad shine in their eyes and saliva coming out of their mouths. They are crazy — and in charge of institutions, schools, newspapers and armies.

They are running around with their high-tech pistols filled with high-tech poisons and their little sadistic CRISPR scissors. They are crazy — yes, they are crazy — and they are killing us slowly, and sometimes not so slowly. Welcome to the future where toxicity is health and the old crazy is the new normal. We are not crazy — they are crazy — and they have been from the beginning. And in 2020, they stopped pretending. What now?

Project “Insect Allies”

You may think that you have seen it all but here is a great idea. Take some insects, infect them with a genetically modified virus designed to genetically edit mature plants in real time, and release them. Release them into wild and repeat, “it’s safe and effective.”

Sweet idea, right? Well, DARPA thought so, and so in 2016, they started a project called “Insect Allies” that is designed to do that. (This is a different project from Oxitec’s controversial release of GM mosquitos.) DARPA’s official story is that in the name of national security, a good way to protect the American crops from potential threats is to genetically modify them using GM viruses as genetic modifiers and insects as flying syringes. And that they just need to test it!

In a 2016 release titled, “DARPA Enlists Insects to Protect Agricultural Food Supply,” the agency stated:

“A new DARPA program is poised to provide an alternative to traditional agricultural threat response, using targeted gene therapy to protect mature plants within a single growing season.

DARPA proposes to leverage a natural and very efficient two-step delivery system to transfer modified genes to plants: insect vectors and the plant viruses they transmit. In the process, DARPA aims to transform certain insect pests into ‘Insect Allies,’ the name of the new effort.”

“‘Insect Allies’ three technical areas — trait design, insect vector optimization, and selective gene therapy in mature plants — layer together to support the goal of rapidly transforming mature plants to protect against natural or intentional agricultural disruption without the need for extensive infrastructure. The foundational knowledge and generalizable tools developed under the program could also support future agricultural innovation.”

Some suspicious peasants may foolishly wonder: What will happen in the short term and in the long term to the people who eat those plants, to the people and animals possibly bitten by those insects, to the wild insects who mate with the infected insects, and to all other life in the area and beyond that may get impacted? What ridiculous nonsense. Here is the answer, peasant: No one knows — and importantly, no one cares. Any more questions?

The first Insect Allies funded paper, titled, “Multiplexed heritable gene editing using RNA viruses and mobile single guide RNAs,” was published in 2020. Please note the word “heritable” in the headline. The paper stated:

“Mutant progeny are recovered in the next generation at frequencies ranging from 65 to 100%; up to 30% of progeny derived from plants infected with a virus expressing three sgRNAs have mutations in all three targeted loci.”

DARPA never disclosed if they tested this program outside of greenhouses.

Objections From the Scientific Community and Even the Pre-2020 Media

Actually, it turned out that a few scientists care — and at least during the pre-COVID era, they have objected.

Here is a short 2019 educational animation made by the German Max Planck Society (formerly the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History). Their main objection is the potential weaponization of the technology, they don’t mind the gene editing in principle.

But our standards for health and dignity are so low that this objection is better than no objection, and even this limited kind of objection and questioning DARPA takes some courage (even though it’s unknown if they would have objected in 2020).

The Insect Allies program – genetically modified viruses in agriculture (MaxPlanckSociety)

Scientists want to use insects to transfer genetically modified viruses to crops in order to make them fitter against pests or environmental influences. But what happens when the viruses become independent? Or the technology for the military is misappropriated? More information: www.mpg.de/12318180/darpa-insect-ally

And here is what Vice (!!) had to say in 2018 about the outcry from scientists:

“In the editorial, published on Thursday in Science Magazine, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology and the University of Freiburg in Germany, and France’s Université de Montpellier, requested more transparency and opportunities for public discussion regarding the project and its implications.

‘Easy simplifications could be used to generate a new class of biological weapons,’ a press release reads, ‘weapons that would be extremely transmissible to susceptible crop species due to insect dispersion as the means of delivery.’”

What did DARPA say?

“In an email to Motherboard, a DARPA spokesperson rebutted the thesis of the Science Magazine piece and denied any intent to deploy technology developed through Insect Allies in an offensive setting.

‘We created Insect Allies specifically to develop technology that can deliver positive, protective traits to plants to help them survive unanticipated and/or fast-moving agricultural threats,’ the spokesperson wrote. ‘We see it as a critical addition to the national security toolkit, part of a layered strategy to preserve the security of the food supply.’”

“The Insect Allies program is a collaboration between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Environmental Protection Agency, US Army, and other agencies. According to a DARPA slide presentation, the goal of Insect Allies is to “stably transform multiple mature crop plants in a complex, multi-species plant and insect community with enhanced trait(s) of agricultural interest” by mid-2021.”

Newsweek covered it, too. In a 2018 article, they said that “the U.S. government’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has been accused of trying to create a new class of biological weapons that would be delivered via virus-infected insects.”

“Scientists with DARPA are looking at introducing genetically modified viruses that can edit chromosomes directly in fields — these are known as horizontal environmental genetic alteration agents (HEGAAs). The DARPA program is using the principles of HEGAAs but, unlike traditional methods of dispersal — like spraying fields with them — it wants to spread them through insects.”

The researchers raising the alarm asked specifically why, for agricultural use, it was so important to use insects as gene modification vectors, given that spraying was available. In response to Newsweek at the time, DARPA denied all allegations of military use and reiterated that the project’s aim was to protect American crops. In 2022, another paper was published where researchers expressed their concerns:

“The hazard and exposure potential of an HEGAA approach can vary greatly depending on the viruses, vector insects, target plant species, and genetic modifications selected and their effects. However, at the current stage of development, the most critical aspect is the compromised reliability of the HEGAA approach, owing mainly to its complex design with three different species …

They are a cause for concern because of the numerous effects that can increase the potential for hazard and exposure. Combined with the current inadequacy of corrective measures, it is clear that there is an urgent need for early analysis of whether HEGAA approaches can be inherently contained and controlled by their specific technology design.”

“Horizontal Environmental Genetic Alteration Agents”

What are HEGAAs? According to Wikipedia, the term “genetic alteration agent” first appears in 2016 in relation to this project, in a “work plan by DARPA describing a tender for contracts to develop genetically modified plant viruses for an approach involving their dispersion into the environment. The prefixing of ‘horizontal environmental’ to the former to generate the acronym HEGAA was first used in the [aforementioned] 2018 scientific publication.”

“Agents such as pathogens, symbionts or synthetic protein assemblages that can be acquired through horizontal transmission in the environment can potentially be engineered to become HEGAAs. This would be achieved using biotechnology methods to confer to them the capacity to alter nucleotides in the chromosomes of infected individuals through sequence-specific editing systems like CRISPR, ZFNs or TALENs.

No known infectious agent naturally has the capacity to gene edit eukaryotes in a manner that can be flexibly targeted to specific sequences (distinct from substantially random natural processes like retroviral integration).”

“By definition, HEGAA induced gene editing events are intended to occur outside of contained facilities such as laboratories or hospitals.

While genetically modified viruses with CRISPR editing have been successfully used as research tools in laboratories or for gene therapy in clinical settings, all gene editing events are intended to physically occur within contained facilities. By contrast, HEGAAs for their intended mode of action relies on inducing gene editing events that occur largely or exclusively in the environment.”

There are two types of HEGAAs: somatic and germline. Somatic HEGAAs are not inheritable, while germline ones “impact somatic cells and also cell lineages from which germline cells can be ultimately generated (e.g. sperm, oocytes, pollen, ovules, zygotes or seeds).”

When it comes to the “Insect Allies” project, it’s a gray area. The original assumption was that “Insect Allies” involved somatic HEGAAs but the aforementioned 2020 paper shows that the genetic changes in plants were heritable. Here is more detail:

HEGAAs are viruses which have been genetically modified to gain a capacity to edit the chromosomes of a target species (e.g. plant or animal) when intentionally released into the environment
The word “horizontal” comes from their ability to be transmitted in the environment by infection
The word “environmental” comes from the intention for these genetically modified viruses to be dispersed into the environment
The words “genetic alteration agents” comes from the capacity to alter the chromosomes of a target species. This might be through causing a random mutation or introducing a new DNA sequence
The specificity of HEGAAs is dependent on two things (1) the range of species the genetically modified virus can infect AND (2) the presence of the suitable DNA sequences in the plant chromosomes of cells that become infected
An example of an insect dispersed viral HEGAA which disrupts a specific plant gene is illustrated in this figure below

All in all, this informational Max Planck Society affiliated website, whose purpose is “to contribute towards fostering an informed and public debate about this type of technology,” is one of the best sources of information on HEGAAs and the “Insect Allies” project. Incidentally, this particular website covers self-spreading vaccines as well. Here is a little video promo of the Euroscience Open Forum 2020:

ESOF2020 Trieste - Going Viral? – GM viruses in the environment (ESOF - EuroScience Open Forum)

This is a live panel discussion open to everyone with any interest in hearing about techniques that would require the intentional dispersion of genetically modified viruses into the environment. Brief accessible introductions to the two main topics under discussion will be given. Followed by a discussion and Q&A session on the considerable issues raised by these proposed techniques.

And here it the actual 2020 panel (some of it is already outdated but very educational):

Going Viral? Intentional dispersion of genetically modified viruses - ESOF2020 Trieste (ESOF - EuroScience Open Forum)

To what extent might GM virus technologies developed for contained uses alter the underlying reasons historically used to justify not releasing GM viruses into the environment? This session aims to foster discussion on deliberate releases of GM viruses into the environment and the implications of developments that might be anticipated within the next 2-5 years. Perspectives from biological and social scientists, ethicists, and policy experts will focus on examples from actual ongoing R&D efforts: (1) transmissible viruses intended to manipulate the immune system of mammals (including rabbits and humans) upon infection (e.g., mass vaccination of entire populations; high hazard strategy); (2) gene editing viruses intended to genetically modify the chromosomes of the individuals they infect (e.g., genetically manipulating crops already planted in fields); (3) non-transmissible viruses without capacity for gene editing (e.g., protecting Florida orange trees from bacterial pathogens, low hazard technique).

“Project Coast”

One of the panelists above mentions “Project Coast” is South Africa — and while it is not directly related to “Insect Allies,” it kind of is.

“Project Coast” was a toxin and bioweapon development project that took place in South Africa during the apartheid era. As a part of that project, scientists developed covert assassination tools and methods of covert sterilization, intended against the black population of South Africa. A warning? No really, a warning?

Project Coast: Apartheid South Africa’s Secret Bioweapon’s and Depopulation Program (seekingjustthefacts)

Project Coast: Was the South African Apartheid regime's secret bio-weapon's lab, and its connection with British scientist and authority on biological warfare, David Kelly; and their secret bio-weapon's and eugenics program. The colonial Apartheid regime's goal was to develop GMO bio-weapons aimed toward genociding the native Black, South African populations, using weaponized Anthax, Ebola, Marburg and sterilization through toxic vaccines.

See: Project Coast: PROOF of Weaponized Ebola in the 80s… “No independent verification that the pathogens created were ever destroyed” - Freedom Outpost (investortimes.com)

Back to DARPA

Here is more from the MPS-affiliated informational website:

“Even as the halfway point of the Insect Allies program approaches, DARPA has chosen not to publicly describe in its response to our Science article what is the basis of their having concluded that a developmental pathway exists that circumvents the early proliferation of biological weapons (described by the black development path in the accompanying image).

This is in addition to explaining in detail why their developmental plan is easier to develop than alternative paths (described by the red paths). As our Science article makes clear, this is central to justifying the wisdom of embarking on the development of HEGAAs, and many other types of GM viruses.

Over the next five years, only a minority of anticipated CRISPR-inspired innovations will involve intentional environmental releases (see recent NAS report). HEGAAs, and some other GM viruses, have the property of an early-stage biological weapons proliferation risk that is not shared with most other proposed techniques (including avant-garde ones like gene drive).

Choosing not to clearly address these obvious issues of global concern, as detailed in the Science article, makes their current model of develop first and explain later an especially unwise path, particularly for this insect-delivered program, that in many ways appears to be designed to get carried away.”

Living Foundries

To provide a backdrop for the “Insect Allies” project, here is a brief look at the DARPA “Living Foundries” bioengineering program, launched in 2010.

DARPA’s Living Foundries program aims to “enable adaptable, scalable, and on-demand production of critical, high-value molecules by programming the fundamental metabolic processes of biological systems to generate a vast number of complex molecules.”

“Programming Biological Systems”

In order to orient ourselves in this attempted new normal, we need to understand the mindset. Please note the use of term “engineer” all throughout this benevolent-sounding presentation:

Dr. Justin Gallivan: Building with Biology, DARPA BiT (DARPAtv)

Dr. Justin Gallivan, Program Manager in DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), discusses how biology can be tapped to yield breakthrough materials and systems. The talk was part of a two-day event held by BTO to bring together leading-edge technologists, start-ups, industry, and academic researchers to look at how advances in engineering and information sciences can be used to drive biology for technological advantage.

DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office

DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office was founded in 2014. Here is an informational video on, in their own words, “DARPA’s way of thinking about biological technology to defend the homeland.”

BioNext (DARPAtv)

This session from DARPA’s 60th anniversary symposium, D60, highlights the role of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office in defending the homeland. BTO Director Dr. Justin Sanchez presents a new biosecurity framework to address the nation’s need for novel capabilities to counter bioterrorism, to deploy innovative biological countermeasures for warfighter protection, and to accelerate force readiness. In addition, Dr. Sanchez provides examples of BTO efforts within the framework, including restoration of nervous system function and achieving cognitive overmatch.

Former Secretary of the Navy Dr. Richard Danzig draws some lessons from history to inform potential solutions for future biological security concerns. Providing a law enforcement perspective, FBI Supervisory Special Agent Ed You describes the current bio-threat landscape. Frontline Ebola physician Dr. Nahid Bhadelia presents her firsthand experience responding to the recent major outbreak in West Africa. Navy Seal Neil Hermansen delivers insights into the challenges facing the nation’s special operation forces.

According to DARPA’s website:

“DARPA has enjoyed a strong relationship with Silicon Valley since the early 1960s, working with innovators to lay the groundwork for new industries built around Agency investments in semiconductors, networking, artificial intelligence, user interfaces, programming, materials, microsystems, and more.

[We knew that!!!] Biotech is now emerging as a breakthrough opportunity space and it represents an area that is ripe for fresh collaboration among DARPA, the nation’s top researchers, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs.”

Here are some of the listed topic of interests:

Building with Biology Using Engineered Living Materials, which focused on programming DNA to grow materials to specifications at the sites where they are needed and developing living materials that are responsive to their environments and can heal when damaged;
Staying on Target: Minimizing Off-Target Effects in Gene Editing, which focused on making personalized medicine feasible by conducting rapid, low-cost screens of an individual’s likely responses to tailored gene therapy;
Creating a Pandemic-free World, which focused on DARPA’s vision of distributed healthcare that combines technology to detect pandemic outbreaks, rapidly identify and grow potent antibodies to fight infectious disease, and response tools for creating a pandemic firebreak;
Immunity on Demand [emphasis mine], which focused on rapidly developing and delivering nucleic-acid-based protections against infectious disease;
Failing Faster: De-Risking the Path to FDA Approval, which focused on using organ-on-chip technology to better predict the efficacy of new drugs in the development pipeline;
A Real-time Window into Your Body’s Chemistry, which focused on tissue-integrating in vivo biosensors to continuously monitor physiology over the long term to predict the onset of disease;
Reinventing Psychiatry Using Neurotechnology, which focused on using implanted, closed-loop neural systems to record and stimulate the brain to treat neuropsychiatric illness;
MindFlight: Your Brain Will Be Your Pilot Today, which focused on direct neural control of complex physical systems;
Memory Enhancement in Everyday Life, which focused on non-invasive electrical and auditory stimulation technology to enhance memory by facilitating the neural replay process

Is it me, or is it that the crazies are running the asylum?

Remote-Controlled Insects

If you think that you have now seen it all, well, you haven’t. Here is a video of scientists in Singapore torturing live insects and turning them into cyborgs. Horrifying.

And here is, you guessed it, DARPA:

“Through a DARPA-funded program, scientists at the University of California invented a tiny rig that connects to an insect’s brain and flight muscles. Once implanted, the device takes over the insect’s body, turning it into a remote control cyborg capable of receiving flight commands wirelessly from a nearby laptop.”

“BioBot” Roaches Could Save Lives With Tiny Backpacks (National Geographic)

Researchers at North Carolina State University are training a swarm of unlikely heroes. By placing an array of microphones and electrode sensors onto a small circuit board, they've created what they call a "backpack" to be worn by Madagascar hissing cockroaches. The backpacks pick up sounds and help control the insect's movement. A researcher uses a joystick to steer the roach toward the sound source. This technology could help first responders find survivors in the aftermath of a disaster.

It’s all good and fun (not really, more like a horror movie), and we could close our eyes — but will it be fun if the emboldened crazies try to remote-control your children?

About the Author

To find more of Tessa Lena’s work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.

Behavior Modification: Medications Can Change Who We Are
Globalists Openly Admitting To Population Control Agenda
China's Dystopian AI Development Incorporates Population…
Gates, Kissinger On Same Path To Population Control
Kissinger: The Genesis of U.S. Government Population Control
The Persistent History Of Population Control
Gov't Scientific Advisors Admit To Using Unethical,…
Technocrats Busted: 'Mass Formation Psychosis' Used To…

Canada Begins Eugenics Program

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/canada/canada-begins-eugenics-program/

While people always point to Nazi, Germany, Canada is no stranger to eugenics. The Sexual Sterilization Act in 1928 forced Indigenous women to undergo sterilizations to diminish their population. Canada provided these women with a skewed “mental deficiency” test in an attempt to prove they were unfit to reproduce. The practice was widespread until the 1970s, although numerous women have reported being coerced into the practice in recent times.

Justin Trudeau’s dad, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, supported eugenics and population “cleansing.” The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation provided the initial foundation for the practice by highlighting the scientific achievement of genome sequencing and combining it with the potential for “reducing the burden of disease on themselves and on society as a whole.”

An excerpt on “Technology and Ethics” that can be found on the Trudeau Foundation website:

"For some analysts, genetic tests, along with the 'genetic understanding of health' that they shape, reflect our society's focus on individual responsibility and productivity. In the words of Roxanne Mykitiuk, 'with genetic tests marketed as a kind of health-risk kit, individuals are being called upon to undertake self-surveillance in the name of reducing the burden of disease on themselves and on society as a whole,' and in doing so to maintain a 'disciplined order of productive citizens.'”

This thinking is identical to other current and past forms of governments who have actively sought to eliminate those who are not considered “productive citizens.” The aforementioned report concluded:

"One of the most significant and pervasive issues is the risk that these new technologies will give rise to new forms of discrimination, inequality, and violations of human dignity, such as discrimination on the basis of genetic characteristics or unequal access to genetic enhancements. Other potential adverse effects include irreparable damage to the environment and to human health and the human genome."

Justin Trudeau is now following in his dad’s footsteps. Beginning in March 2023, Canada will expand its Medical Aid in Dying, or MAID, for people “whose sole underlying condition is depression, bipolar disorder, personality disorders, schizophrenia, PTSD or any other mental affliction.” There is no denying that mental disorders cause suffering – but do they call for government-aided suicide? This means that a vulnerable person suffering from a mental disorder, who may not be able to make a decision on their own, could be persuaded by a doctor to end their life. The measure also notes that “any other mental affliction” could be grounds for death by the government, which is more dystopian than anything George Orwell could have imagined.

Mental health providers stress that suicide is never an option. This bill is about voluntary eugenics, encouraged by healthcare providers, rather than public health.

Conveniently, Canada is implementing this measure after its COVID restrictions sent the nation into a mental health tailspin. Young Global Leader Trudeau is pushing forward the Great Reset and will likely call for universal healthcare. He considers these people a “burden” to his socialistic dreams as psychiatric conditions usually require lifelong care.

This is one of the evilest measures implemented by Justin Trudeau. He is persuading vulnerable Canadians to end their lives to create Schwab’s (Justin Trudeau does not have original ideas) dream Utopia where everyone will “be happy.”

Canada Begins Eugenics Program

Canadian retailer Simons glamorizes assisted suicide as ‘The Most Beautiful Exit’

https://thebridgehead.ca/2022/11/30/canadian-retailer-simons-glamorizes-assisted-suicide-as-the-most-beautiful-exit/

Suicide with a smile and soft music is still suicide. It is still self-extinction. It is still death.

(LifeSiteNews) – “Canada’s full-on embrace and glamorization of ‘assisted suicide’ for physically healthy people is one of the most dire and consequential things happening in the western world right now,” Matt Walsh noted recently. “And it’s not getting nearly as much attention as it should.”

“Glamorization” is no exaggeration. While international watchdogs, European governments, and even the steel-stomached press react in horror to the drip drip of euthanasia horror stories coming out of Canada – including five veterans being proactively offered assisted suicide, the justice minister noting that assisted suicide could be available to those who cannot ask for it, and impoverished Canadians choosing lethal injections due to lack of resources – Canada’s suicide activists and parliamentarians are forging forwards unapologetically.

In fact, the Quebec-based clothes retailer Simons decided to join the fray with a video titled “All is Beauty” or – embedded in the video itself – “The Most Beautiful Exit.” The video tells the story of Jennyfer Hatch of British Columbia, a 37-year-old with chronic pain from Ehlers Danlos syndrome who decided to die by assisted suicide on October 23. The video was posted to Simons’ shopping website and was intended to be an “inspiration.”

Peter Simons, the chief merchant for the chain, stated that the video was an ambitious project: “”We really felt — after everything we’ve been through in the last two years and everyone’s been through — maybe it would resonate more to do a project that’s less commercially oriented and more focused on inspiration and values that we hold dear.” One of those values, apparently, is assisted suicide.

The video is an overt glamorization of assisted suicide. “Last breaths are sacred,” Hatch says.

Everything, says Hatch, is beauty. The video flashes through images of her as a child; of beautiful beaches and lush forests; of laughter with friends, and floating bubbles. Her suicide, too, she says, will be beautiful – “you just have to be brave enough to see it.” It is the same message as “dying with dignity” – to die with dignity, you must die sooner. To live bravely, choose death. But suicide with a smile and soft music is still suicide. It is still self-extinction. It is still death. But watching Hatch’s video you might be persuaded, just for a moment – that it is beautiful.

Hatch’s voice falls silent, and the short film ends with a dedication: “For Jennyfer. June 1985 to October 2022.” Everything was beautiful – just not beautiful enough to convince her to stay.

This is glamorizing suicide. This is advertising self-extinction as wonderful. It is not just a beautiful exit – now, Hatch’s video says it is the most beautiful exit. It is sending precisely the wrong message to those struggling, and wondering if suicide might be their best option. As Dr. Jordan Peterson noted in response to Simon’s video: “Death romanticism is very attractive to depressed adolescents, and very dangerous for that very reason.” This is just one more example of filmmakers making suicide attractive, from Me Before You to Million Dollar Baby to Breathe.

We need more films that highlight the beauty of life – but not as an encouragement for people to kill themselves. The concluding message should not be that suicide is a beautiful exit. The conclusion should be a plea: Look around you. Please stay. Please don’t go.

Canadian retailer Simons glamorizes assisted suicide as ‘The Most Beautiful Exit’

How Abortion and Transgenderism = Depopulation

How Abortion and Transgenderism = Depopulation :: By Geri Ungurean

https://www.raptureready.com/2019/02/01/abortion-transgenderism-depopulation-geri-ungurean/

Years ago, I wrote an article about a strange rock formation called the Georgia Guide Stones. Upon those rocks are engraved the globalists’ “ten commandments.” I actually referred to these commandments as belonging to Antichrist.

I want the reader to understand that laws like the one we saw passed in NY just days ago which allows doctors to abort unborn children right up to the day of delivery – and now a bill in Congress from Pelosi and the Dems which will classify children with so-called “Gender Dysphoria” as a group in need of protection – have one main goal in common: DEPOPULATION.

That protection will manifest in the removal of these children from homes in which the parents do not wish to enable their children to become transgenders.

I originally wrote an article on the Georgia Guide Stones back in 2015. I will place excerpts from that piece in this article, but I will expand on what I believe is happening throughout the world today and how it is directly linked to the strange rock formation called the Georgia Guide Stones.

I will also be placing an article in this piece which just came out from heritage.org. This article will help the reader to understand Pelosi’s “Equality Act” and how it is all connected to Depopulation.

The Georgia Guide Stones, Depopulation and the Coming Antichrist

In 1980, a very strange stone formation was erected in a city in Georgia. It has been called the Stonehenge of America. Its name is the Georgia Guide Stones.

“The Georgia Guide Stones is a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages, and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs.

The monument stands at the highest point in Elbert County, about 90 miles (140 km) east of Atlanta, 45 miles (72 km) from Athens, and 9 miles (14 km) north of the center of Elberton. The stones are visible from Georgia Highway 77 (Hartwell Highway) and are reached by turning east on Guidestones Road. The structure is sometimes referred to as an “American Stonehenge.” The monument is 19 feet 3 inches (5.87 m) tall, made from six granite slabs weighing 237,746 pounds (107,840 kg) in all. One slab stands in the center, with four arranged around it. A capstone lies on top of the five slabs, which are astronomically aligned. An additional stone tablet, which is set in the ground a short distance to the west of the structure, provides some notes on the history and purpose of the Guidestones.”

Guide Stones Ten Commandments of Antichrist (Satan)

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature

(emphasis dashes— added for the sake of this article).

Shall we go through the “commandments” one by one?

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

This clearly states that the population on the earth should be maintained at 500 million people to be in “perpetual balance with nature.” Can they get any more into New Age terminology than that?

I checked the number of people as of 2018 who inhabit the earth. 7.6 BILLION people live on the earth at this time.

Shall we do the math? Well, to put it in its simplest form – the NWO must rid our planet of almost 94% of all people to bring the population to its goal of under 500 million.

One must ponder as to how to reduce the number of people on the earth by 94%. Bill Gates is doing his part by sending vaccines to third world countries which sterilizes young women. India got wise to this madman and analyzed the vaccines after many of their young women fell ill, while many others died.

India has a lawsuit against the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but I seriously doubt whether this will ever be brought to trial.

The reader may read the entire article here.

Here is the article from Heritage.org which will explain Pelosi’s proposed legislation for the protection of children who wish to “trans” to the opposite sex:

From heritage.org

Americans have long understood that children are best cared for by their parents. The state can only intervene in the family when there is demonstrable evidence of abuse and neglect.

This has long been established in our laws. But now, transgender ideology is silencing doctors and challenging the way courts define parental abuse and neglect.

Last year in Ohio, a judge removed a biological girl from her parents’ custody after they declined to help her “transition” to male with testosterone supplements. The Cincinnati Children’s gender clinic recommended these treatments for gender dysphoria (the condition of being distressed with one’s biological sex).

When her parents wanted to treat her with counseling instead, the county prosecutor charged them with abuse and neglect, while transgender activists and pro-trans doctors compared their decision to denying treatment for asthma or even cancer patients.

That all happened without federal legislation.

But now, one of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s top legislative priorities, the Equality Act, could give the transgender community a vice grip over the medical profession. It could open the floodgates for lawsuits against doctors who don’t fall in line with transgender ideology.

Politicizing the medical treatment of gender dysphoria could lead to more prosecutions against parents who refuse to aid in the sterilization of their children. As more doctors recommend that children take puberty blockers at age 11, cross-sex hormones at 16, and undergo “sex-reassignment” surgeries at 18, parents who resist could face charges of child abuse and lose custody of their children.

The tragedy in Ohio could be repeated in families across America.

Turning the Law Into a Sword Against Doctors

The transgender movement wants to dominate the field of medicine, and to do so it is threatening doctors and hospitals with penalties.

Some states have already passed laws similar to Pelosi’s Equality Act. In New Jersey and California, transgender activists have sued Catholic hospitals for “discrimination” on the basis of gender identity because they wouldn’t perform sex-change surgeries for patients with gender dysphoria.

These lawsuits may seem preposterous, but they were enabled by state anti-discrimination laws that treat sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes and health care facilities as public accommodations. The text of the Equality Act that was introduced in the 115th Congress does the same.

Pelosi’s bill would add sexual orientation and gender identity to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, making hospitals and doctors across America vulnerable to costly litigation if they don’t follow the medical recommendations of the transgender movement. It would turn anti-discrimination law—which was meant to protect disenfranchised minority groups—into a coercive sword to threaten doctors into submission to transgender ideology.

Does Transgender Ideology Make for Good Medicine?

Part of the reason some doctors resist transgender ideology is that it is incompatible with good medicine and would harm rather than help their patients.

The American Psychological Association’s manual of mental disorders classifies gender dysphoria as a mental illness. Research shows that 75 to 95 percent of children with gender dysphoria who go through puberty without any transgender treatments actually become comfortable with their bodies.

But the transgender movement ignores these statistics, aggressively pushing for gender-dysphoric children to be treated with non-FDA-approved uses of drugs, even though side effects can include loss of bone density, decline of cognitive ability, and infertility.

Dr. Michelle Cretella, executive director of the American College of Pediatricians, describes it as “institutionalized child abuse.”

Transgender activists have already tried to silence doctors who warned patients about these dangers. The Human Rights Campaign—a leading LGBT group—devotes an entire website to trying to discredit Dr. Paul McHugh, the former lead psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University Hospital who put a stop to the hospital’s sex-reassignment surgeries. McHugh says the surgeries were “fundamentally cooperating with a mental illness.”

**** Here is an article I wrote about Dr. McHugh:

Transgenderism: A Mental Disorder Says A Top Psychiatrist From Johns Hopkins

Back to the Heritage article:

Trans Activists Are Putting Children and Doctors in the Driver’s Seat

Transgender activists and pro-trans physicians often seek to exclude parents from the process of medical decision-making. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital’s Transgender Health Clinic says parents may be excluded from interviews because they might make their children feel uncomfortable asking questions.

Remarkably, this clinic has deemed 100 percent of the patients seeking care to be “appropriate candidates for continued gender treatment.” Even the Ohio judge who terminated one couple’s parental rights expressed “concern” at this astoundingly high approval rate.

Transgender advocates dismiss these concerns by sounding an alarm that gender-dysphoric children will be at higher risk of suicide if they don’t receive hormone treatment.

But the evidence suggests transgender treatments can actually increase the likelihood of suicide. A study in Sweden on adults who underwent sex-reassignment surgeries showed they were 19 times more likely than the general population to commit suicide after undergoing operations. This is particularly noteworthy because, in Sweden, cultural support for those who identify as transgender is very strong, so social stigma is less likely to account for the suicides.

We should be particularly cautious with experimental treatments on children because the long-term effects of transgender treatments have yet to be seen. Even the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid under the Obama administration pointed out that “mortality from this patient population did not become apparent until after 10 years.”

Endocrinologist Dr. Michael Laidlaw also warns that the long-term harms to kids may not show up until years later when, as young adults, they start asking: “How come I can’t have children at this point?’ Well, it’s because their fertility was destroyed by some combination of puberty blockers, wrong sex hormones, and surgery.’”

And Dr. Stephen B. Levine, professor of psychiatry at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, asks the pertinent question: Are children really capable of comprehending the way that hormone treatments will alter their lives and render them unable to have their own children? There’s a reason we have informed consent laws—to protect people, like children, from being taken advantage of.

Expediting a Bad Trend

In this cultural and political climate, doctors and courts are more and more likely to seek to exclude parents from life-changing decisions about their children.

America has seen an explosion of “gender clinics” and diagnoses of “gender dysphoria” in just the past few years. In 2013, America had only three gender clinics. Today, there are more than 41. These clinics report 400 percent increases in children and teens identifying as trans.

The Equality Act would expedite this trend by giving the transgender movement a powerful legal weapon to drive medical consensus that could undermine the rights of parents.

As more parents wrestle with finding the most loving and helpful solutions for their children struggling with gender dysphoria, the government must support them—not undermine them. Parents must remain central to the decision-making process when it comes to the medical care of children suffering from gender dysphoria. source

Brethren, have you connected the dots? The globalist powers that be in this incredibly evil world have begun the process of depopulation of our planet. Transgender children become “sterile” after puberty is interrupted and the hormones are given to bring about the “sex change.”

The percentage of transgenders who attempt suicide is incredibly high. I’ve been told by a liberal that this suicide rate is linked to the negative reactions of peers and family. Heritage addressed that with these facts:

“But the evidence suggests transgender treatments can actually increase the likelihood of suicide. A study in Sweden on adults who underwent sex-reassignment surgeries showed they were 19 times more likely than the general population to commit suicide after undergoing operations. This is particularly noteworthy because, in Sweden, cultural support for those who identify as transgender is very strong, so social stigma is less likely to account for the suicides.”

We must pray for the helpless children who are being indoctrinated by Leftist liberal parents. These people are placing the idea in their children’s minds about transgenderism. And public schools are helping that indoctrination along by teaching children that it’s okay and healthy to feel that they may have been born as the wrong sex.

Clearly, children are not equipped to make decisions about this disastrous attempt to change their sex!

But if Pelosi and her demonic peers get their way, parents will begin to lose their children to the State.

Pray for these children! Pray for their parents!

How much longer, Lord?

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

ABORTION

http://www.rightgrrl.com/1999/biglie.html

In the late 1930s, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, came up with the idea for the infamous "Negro Project." Sanger, despite the rosy and saint-like portrait the organization presents of her, was a frank racist. Judging by her public statements and private letters, the woman thought that blacks - southern blacks in particular - were simple, child-like brutes whose fertility needed managing the same way a farmer needs to tend to his breeding stock of sheep or cows.

Alarmed by the numbers of southern blacks who were migrating to northern cities, Sanger and her associates created the Negro Project. They believed that, by convincing black people to limit the size of their families, they would prevent the black population's numbers from overwhelming those of the white population. It was assumed that blacks - they especially worried about the men - would look suspiciously on any white effort to meddle with their fertility, so a clever fiction was created. Black elites - doctors, educators and even ministers - were enlisted to preach contraception and, later, abortion. Black people were told that, if they just learned to limit the size of their families, whites would come to respect them for their self-control. One day, this fiction said, this respect would lead to greater civil rights for blacks. In other words, fewer black children would equal more freedom.

This was a lie, and a cruel one at that. As we all know, black America's civil rights were not won by condoms or The Pill. Planned Parenthood had nothing to do with the eventual destruction of segregation. The wall of Jim Crow came tumbling down because black America rose up, not because we had the correct number of abortions.

Margaret Sanger's Negro Project is discussed at length in the book Blessed Are the Barren. Although the Project is not as well-known as the Tuskegee Experiment, it involves the same kinds of falsehoods and manipulations.

Not everyone smiles in your face is your friend, my father said. Recently, I visited my old neighborhood. It now has a bookstore, a drugstore, a dry cleaner and even restaurants. The abortion clinic is still there, and it still looks beautiful with the same shining white concrete and gleaming glass doors.

Man Up (Seth Gruber on Hope for Our Times)

Abortion

Is abortion murder?

https://www.gotquestions.org/is-abortion-murder.html

The subject of abortion is perhaps one of the most highly charged issues of our day. Finding an honest answer to the question “is abortion murder?” takes courage for those who have performed abortions or have had abortions themselves. The Bible is clear about the fact that murder is wrong (Exodus 20:13). However, in some cases, the Bible does not forbid killing. Soldiers representing their country were expected to kill soldiers on the opposing side (Joshua 11:20). That is not murder. Animals were killed for food and for sacrifice (Exodus 24:5; Genesis 9:3–4). That is not murder either.

Murder is defined as “the unlawful, premeditated killing of one human being by another.” Murder is unlawful killing—that is, killing that is done by the judgment of one human being against another, for personal (rather than national) reasons. The Bible condemns murder repeatedly as a characteristic of a wicked society (Deuteronomy 5:17; Isaiah 1:21; Hosea 4:2; Matthew 5:21). Determining whether or not abortion is murder involves two considerations: first, whether or not a fetus in utero is actually a human being, and, second, if a fetus is a child, whether or not abortion can be rightly called murder since it is legal in most countries. If murder is unlawful killing, it would follow that a lawful killing would not be murder.

One reason murder is outlawed in many places is that it is unethical for one person to unilaterally decide the fate of another. Under the Old Testament Law, a murderer was not put to death unless there were multiple witnesses: “No person shall be put to death on the testimony of one witness” (Numbers 35:30). In war, soldiers do not decide to kill for their own purposes; rather, they kill in the national interest—if they fight for an honorable nation, the national interest will be to protect innocent civilians from some threat. Abortion is different. Abortion is killing based on a mother’s unilateral judgment and choice. Such unprovoked killing of the defenseless is unethical and should define abortion as murder in any society—unless the fetus is not human. If the fetus is just a mass of impersonal tissue or something less than human, ending its life would not face the same ethical challenge and would not be considered murder.

So, is a fetus a human? Or is it something else? Biologically speaking, human life begins at conception. When the mother’s egg and the father’s sperm come together, they combine and create a new string of DNA that is personalized and totally unique. DNA is coded information, the blueprint for the new human’s growth and development. No more genetic material needs to be added; the zygote in the womb is as human as the mother in whose womb it dwells. The difference between a fetus and any one of us is one of age, location, and level of dependence. When a mother aborts the process of fetal development, she is destroying a unique life.

The Bible clearly points to conception as the beginning of human life. Samson said, “I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother’s womb” (Judges 16:17). He refers to his unborn self as having already been what God planned him to be—a Nazirite. David says, “You formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb” (Psalm 139:13). Again, we see David referring to himself as a person in the womb. Then, he says, “Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them” (Psalm 139:16). David is saying that God had all of his days planned out for him while he was still in the womb. Again, this evidence points to personhood beginning at conception, rather than at the moment of birth. We see God had a similar plan for the life of the pre-born Jeremiah: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5).

The Bible considers a fetus to be an unborn child, a planned human being that God is forming from the moment of conception. This being the case, it doesn’t really matter what human jurisprudence says or how socially or politically acceptable abortion is. God’s law takes precedence. A mother who decides to abort her child is unilaterally making a decision to end another person’s life—and that is and always has been the definition of murder.

Is abortion murder?

Abortion: The Mass Murder of Children

https://getalifemedia.com/video/ab.shtml

Imagine somebody coming along, murdering, ruthlessly slaughtering, ten times the amount of people as Hitler did during the Holocaust with the Jews. Then consider the methods that were used by this group of people in order to massacre others in cold blood, including dismembering them alive, literally limb by limb, and then casually throwing their remains into a garbage receptacle. Still other forms of extermination upon these innocent victims involved cutting their spinal cords and then sucking out their brains until they experienced a horrible gruesome death. Then imagine the perpetrators not only becoming millionaires from this sickening human annihilation, but they even go so far as to say they have a “legal right” to do this deadly deed. Believe it or not, what has just been described to you is not a make-believe horror movie for Hollywood, rather it’s our society’s current deadly, dark reality with the Abortion movement. Therefore, this study, Abortion The Mass Murder of Children gets to the heart of the matter and equips you with the much needed hard core evidence that unmasks the gruesome reality of Abortion. Here you will discover such shocking truths as:

The History of Abortion
The Motive of Abortion
The Church & Abortion
The Survivors of Abortion

The Aftermath of Abortion
The Response to Abortion
The Future of Abortion, Part 1

The Future of Abortion, Part 2

Don’t be fooled by the Abortion industry’s terminology. It’s not a fetus, it’s a baby. It’s not a pregnancy termination, it’s the murder of a child, which means, no one, male or female, has a so-called right to do. The sad reality is this, we are witnessing the greatest human holocaust of all time and it’s high time that we speak up on behalf of these little ones.

What does the Bible say about abortion?

https://www.gotquestions.org/abortion-Bible.html

The Bible never specifically addresses the issue of abortion. However, there are numerous teachings in Scripture that make it abundantly clear what God’s view of abortion is.

Jeremiah 1:5 tells us that God knows us before He forms us in the womb. Psalm 139:13–16 speaks of God’s active role in our creation and formation in the womb. Exodus 21:22–25 prescribes the same penalty—death—for someone who causes the death of a baby in the womb as for someone who commits murder. This law and its punishment clearly indicate that God considers a baby in the womb to be just as much a human being as a full-grown adult. For the Christian, abortion is not a matter of a woman’s right to choose to have a baby. The baby is already present and living. Abortion is a matter of the life or death of a human being made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26–27; 9:6).

What does the Bible say about abortion? Simply put, abortion is murder. It is the killing of a human being created in the image of God.

A common argument against the Christian stance on abortion is “What about cases of rape and/or incest?” As difficult as it would be to become pregnant as a result of rape or incest, is the murder of a baby the solution? Two wrongs do not make a right. Intentionally killing the unborn child is not the answer. Also, keep in mind that having an abortion is a traumatic experience. It seems nonsensical to add an additional trauma to the woman. Too, abortion can be a means of rapists covering up their crimes. For example, if a minor is molested and becomes pregnant and then is taken to have an abortion, the molestation could continue without penalty. Abortion will never erase the pain of rape or incest, but it very well may add to it.

A child who is conceived through rape or incest is as much made in the image of God as any other human. That child’s life should be protected just as much as the life of any other human being. The circumstances of conception never determine the worth of a person or that person’s future. The baby in this situation is completely innocent and should not be punished for the evil act of his or her father. Depending on the situation, the mother might choose to raise the child. If she does not already have a community of support, there are many organizations and local churches ready to walk alongside her. Or she might place the child for adoption. There are many families, some unable to have children on their own, who stand ready to receive and love a child from any background.

It’s also important to keep in mind that abortions due to rape or incest account for a very small percentage of total abortions: only 1 percent of abortions can be traced to cases of rape or incest (Torres and Forrest, cited by Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health and the Alan Guttmacher Institute in An Overview of Abortion in the United States, October 2001, www.abortionfacts.com/facts/8#cite-1, accessed 9/9/21).

Another argument often used against the Christian stance on abortion is “What about when the life of the mother is at risk?” Honestly, this is the most difficult question to answer on the issue of abortion. First, let’s remember that such a situation is exceedingly rare. Dr. Landrum Shettles, a pioneer in the field of in vitro fertilization, wrote, “Less than 1 percent of all abortions are performed to save the mother’s life” (Landrum Shettles and David Rorvik, Rites of Life, Zondervan Publishing House, 1983, p. 129). Dr. Irving Cushner, Professor of Obstetrics at the UCLA School of Medicine, when testifying before the U. S. Senate, was asked how often abortions are necessary to save the life of the mother or to preserve her physical health. His response: “In this country, about 1 percent” (testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States on October 14, 1981, quoted in The Village Voice, July 16, 1985).

Other medical professionals go further, stating that abortion is never necessary to save the mother’s life. Over 1,000 OB-GYNs and maternal healthcare experts signed a statement in 2012, saying, in part, “As experienced practitioners and researchers in obstetrics and gynaecology, we affirm that direct abortion—the purposeful destruction of the unborn child—is not medically necessary to save the life of a woman” (Dublin Declaration on Maternal Health, www.dublindeclaration.com, accessed 9/9/21). Further, in 2019, “medical leaders representing more than 30,000 doctors said intentionally killing a late-term unborn baby in an abortion is never necessary to save a mother’s life” (www.lifenews.com/2019/03/05/30000-doctors-say-abortion-is-never-medically-necessary-to-save-a-mothers-life, accessed 9/9/21).

Second, let’s remember that God is a God of miracles. He can preserve the life of a mother and her child despite all the medical odds being against it. Third, even in the small percentage of abortions performed to save the life of the mother, most of those abortions can be prevented by an early induced delivery of the baby or a C-section. It is extremely rare that a baby must be actively aborted in order to save the life of the mother. Ultimately, if the life of the mother is genuinely at risk, the course of action can only be decided by the woman, her doctor, oftentimes the father of the child, and God. Any woman facing this extremely difficult situation should pray to the Lord for wisdom (James 1:5) as to what He would have her do.

The overwhelming majority of abortions performed today involve women who simply do not want to have the baby. As indicated above, just 2 percent of abortions are for the reason of rape, incest, or the mother’s life being at risk. Even in these more difficult 2 percent of instances, abortion should never be the first option. The life of a human being in the womb is worth every effort to preserve.

For those who have had an abortion, remember that the sin of abortion is no less forgivable than any other sin. Through faith in Christ, all sins can be forgiven (John 3:16; Romans 8:1; Colossians 1:14). A woman who has had an abortion, a man who has encouraged an abortion, and a doctor who has performed an abortion—all can be forgiven by faith in Jesus Christ.

What does the Bible say about abortion?

(Got Questions Ministries)

Is it ever ok to get an abortion? Is it ever necessary to have an abortion? What about cases of rape or incest? What if the life of the mother is at risk? In this video, Pastor Nelson with Bible Munch answers the question, “What does the Bible say about abortion?”.

What does the Bible say about abortion?

Videos

God and The Worship Of Molech

(Hope For Our Times w/ Seth Gruber)

The Tragedy of Abortion (Lamb & Lion Ministries )

Does abortion really matter regarding the future of our society?

EPIC: Catholic Priest Drops Truth Bomb On Joe Biden

(The Charlie Kirk Show)

Reverend Billy Kosco out of St. Henry's Parish in Buckeye, Arizona delivers an absolute SMACKDOWN of pro-abortion catholics & Joe Biden. This homily is a must-listen.

The TRUTH about LIFE!!! (Calvary Chapel Signal Hill)

Pastor James and Seth Gruber will discuss why it's so important to advocate for those that cannot defend themselves; primarily the unborn. This stands as the greatest civil rights issue of all time!

The Point of No Return (Prophecy Watchers w/ Billy Crone)

The numbers are staggering. The profit margins are shocking. Are there really individuals selling baby parts for Lamborghini's? 61 million American children have been murdered in the womb since 1973. 1.5 BILLION lives have been terminated worldwide since the 1980s. This may not be a pleasant conversation but a necessary one. Abortion, of course, is only the first step towards implementing Adolf Hitler's dream. The Jewish people were just a starting point. What's next? Death panels? They're coming. Euthanasia? Age limits on the shelf life of human beings? All of these are underway. Learn the history of Planned Parenthood and the staggering amount of money being generated by this baby killing factory. Gary and Billy Crone discuss a subject that should make every Christian (and human being) shake their head in pure disbelief.

Margaret Sanger & Planned Parenthood’s Eugenic Worldview

https://rtl.org/educational-materials/margaret-sanger/

Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood. Starting as a single birth control clinic in New York City in 1916, Planned Parenthood has grown into the largest provider and promoter of abortion in America. Far from being an obscure historical figure, Margaret Sanger’s ideas continue to influence her organization today. Planned Parenthood even continues to hand out a prestigious award in her name.

The following is a fact sheet examining the life of Margaret Sanger, her views on eugenics, her association with well-known racists, and the influence it has on Planned Parenthood today.

A Brief History of Margaret Sanger

Margaret Higgins (Sanger) was born in New York in 1879. Her family dynamics are very interesting. Her father, Michael Higgins, was an Irish immigrant and Civil War veteran. His job was to carve gravestones, but his passion as a freethinking socialist was politics. Her mother, Anne, was a devout Catholic. Anne died from tuberculosis when Sanger was 19. The Higgins family had 11 children; Sanger was the sixth child. Sanger blames her mother’s death on these 11 births.

Sanger pursued a career as a nurse. She married architect William Sanger in 1902, and they had three children. Like her father, Sanger’s husband was also very interested in radical politics, and the family moved to Greenwich Village to take part in a variety of generally left-wing political movements.

Sanger stated her commitment to promoting birth control began after witnessing a woman die following an illegal abortion in 1912. Sanger founded a monthly journal, The Woman Rebel, to openly confront federal laws against promoting and providing birth control. To escape a conviction, Sanger briefly fled to England in 1914, where she became associated with Havelock Ellis, the noted eugenicist and researcher of sex and drugs.

Around this time Sanger abandoned her marriage and carried on affairs with several notable people, including Ellis and famous author H.G. Wells. In 1922 she married wealthy oil businessman James Noah Slee and remained in an open marriage with her much older second husband until his death in 1943.

After her return from England, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 in Brooklyn as a small birth control clinic, and from there it would quickly expand into a national movement.

In 1917 Sanger founded another monthly journal, the Birth Control Review. In 1921 her movement became known as the American Birth Control League. She continued to tirelessly produce books, articles, and speeches as she continued her fight against the federal Comstock laws banning contraception.

Her organization suffered from fierce internal conflicts and Sanger left to start another organization in 1928. The two organizations would eventually merge in 1939 as the Birth Control Federation of America, later changing their name to Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.

Sanger went on to found the International Planned Parenthood Federation in 1952, serving as the president until her retirement in 1959.

Sanger died in 1966 from heart failure in Arizona at age 86.

Margaret Sanger’s Eugenics

Eugenics is the science of improving society through controlling reproduction. “Eugenics” is derived from Greek, meaning “good race.” Eugenics is generally divided into two camps: positive eugenics and negative eugenics. The positive camp believes in encouraging those with superior genetics to have more children than those with inferior genetics, and the negative camp believes in preventing those with inferior genetics from having children. Sanger was a strident believer in negative eugenics.

Eugenicists came to believe the field of genetics was the key to all human traits and behavior. Sanger agreed that genetics was the cause of human poverty and therefore believed poor individuals were incapable of developing into useful members of the human race. By allowing the poor to “breed,” Sanger believed they were going to swamp the privileged elite through sheer numbers.

In Sanger’s mind, charity was horribly cruel because she believed it perpetuated poverty. In her 1922 book The Pivot of Civilization, Sanger devoted an entire chapter to “The Cruelty of Charity.”

She wrote, “[Charity] encourages the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.”

Despite Sanger’s own upbringing in a large family, Sanger wrote that people who had large families were engaging in monstrous evils. In 1920 Sanger wrote Women and the New Race, and devoted an entire chapter to “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.”

She wrote, “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it. The same factors which create the terrible infant mortality rate, and which swell the death rate of children between the ages of one and five, operate even more extensively to lower the health rate of the surviving members.”

Throughout her life Sanger held the view that the poor and the disabled were sub-human. In a 1957 television interview with Mike Wallace on ABC, she said, “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically.”

While birth control is largely advocated today as something that frees women—and Margaret Sanger certainly believed in this given her personal lifestyle—Sanger’s advocacy always came back to improving society at the cost of personal liberty of those she decided were “unfit.”

In her concluding chapter of The Pivot of Civilization, Sanger wrote, “Every single case of inherited defect, every malformed child, every congenitally tainted human being brought into this world is of infinite importance to that poor individual; but it is of scarcely less importance to the rest of us and to all of our children who must pay in one way or another for these biological and racial mistakes.”

Sterilizing the poor was one of Sanger’s passions. In a 1932 speech Sanger laid out several points crucial to a plan for worldwide peace.(1) Peace required people to, “apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization, and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”

Forced sterilization was sadly a common practice in America in her time, and Sanger endorsed it. In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the practice of forced sterilization in Buck v. Bell. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes infamously concluded his opinion in the case by writing, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The case has never been overturned, though Sanger-style forced sterilization has mostly come to be seen today for the atrocious evil it is. Even Planned Parenthood is reluctantly forced to acknowledge Sanger’s painful role in endorsing the infamous decision in Buck v. Bell.(2)

The legacy of eugenics still lives on today. Planned Parenthood’s president in 1973—when Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton were decided by the U.S. Supreme Court—was Dr. Alan F. Guttmacher, former vice president of the American Eugenics Society. Today his name adorns the Guttmacher Institute, the premier research organization affiliated with the abortion industry.

Planned Parenthood continues to oppose late-term abortion bans on grounds that a prenatal diagnosis of disability happens later in pregnancy; they believe late-term abortions must stay legal so disabled children can be aborted. Many abortion supporters today will argue there are too many human beings and we’re incapable of taking care of all of them, so this “dead weight of human waste” ought to be aborted. Arguments for aborting a child rather than letting them grow up poor or in a less privileged environment echo the sentiment that the most “merciful” thing we can do for them is to kill them.

Margaret Sanger and Abortion

In public, Margaret Sanger opposed claims that she was encouraging abortion, and her organization’s educational information promoted birth control instead of abortion. Yet, in private correspondence she showed a cavalier attitude about abortion, and her organization referred women for illegal abortions

Was Margaret Sanger secretly supportive of abortion, but recognized that public opinion on the issue was vociferously against it at the time? Maybe Sanger truly believed that birth control and eugenics would create a race of supermen, thus completely eliminating any “need” for abortion. Or perhaps Sanger was simply ambivalent about the issue.

As late as the 1950s, Planned Parenthood was still publicly stating that abortion takes the life of a child.(4) Around this time their leaders began discussing early pushes to legalize abortion.(5) When New York legalized abortion in 1970, Planned Parenthood was ready to open an abortion clinic the next day. Planned Parenthood has since opposed every limit on abortion imaginable, even opposing the ban on partial-birth abortions.

Margaret Sanger and Racism

Much like her views on abortion, Sanger didn’t really speak publicly in favor of racism. Yet looking at how Sanger aided and abetted genuine racists, it’s impossible for anyone to honestly claim Sanger wasn’t complicit in normalizing racism.

In 1926, Sanger accepted a speaking invitation from the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan in New Jersey. She wrote in her autobiography that her speech went over so well she received a dozen invitations to speak to other similar groups.

Racists were allowed to write in her journal, Birth Control Review, and were invited to help lead her organization. One notable example was Lothrop Stoddard, author of the 1920 book The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against White World-Supremacy. Stoddard is not some fringe character; his book is even mentioned in The Great Gatsby. After Stoddard published his book, Sanger’s American Birth Control League invited him to join their national council.

Sanger was not naive; she understood the practical implications her views on poverty and unfit racial traits would have on minorities. When she sought to increase commitment to birth control in Black communities through her “Negro Project,” Sanger feared the conclusions some Black citizens might logically reach given the effects of her quest to stop the poor from having families. She wrote a letter in 1939 to fellow eugenicist Dr. Clarence Gamble (heir to the Proctor & Gamble fortune), laying out her goals for managing public relations:

“The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”(6)

It’s crucial to understand the practical effects that eugenics—and later legalized abortion—would have on the Black community and other minorities. Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood were fully aware that minorities were heavily represented in the categories of people Sanger called “human waste” and “racial mistakes.”

According to the census there are about 44 million Americans who identify themselves as Black in 2019. Since Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton legalized abortion in 1973, numbers from the Guttmacher Institute and the Centers for Disease Control show that Black women have had more than 20 million abortions. A third of the Black community is missing today largely because of the work of Margaret Sanger and her Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Margaret Sanger & Planned Parenthood’s Eugenic Worldview

Planned Parenthood Head Says Abortion Provider Is ‘Canceling’ Founder Margaret Sanger

https://www.dailywire.com/news/planned-parenthood-head-says-abortion-provider-is-canceling-founder-margaret-sanger

Do You Know Roe? A Reflection on the Meaning of Life By Tim Moore

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/do-you-know-roe/

[read in Lamplighter (pdf)]

January 22, 2019 marked the 46th anniversary of a U.S. Supreme Court decision that continues to tear at our national conscience. That was the date when the Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion throughout the United States.

Coming on the heels of the Vietnam War and the social unrest that marked the 1960s, the activist court had already begun undoing legal precedents that had guided our nation for generations. In 1963, the Warren Court ruled that official prayer in schools could no longer be tolerated.

By 1973, the liberal justices were willing to push the boundaries even further. In the Roe decision, Justice Harry Blackman resorted to citing “penumbras of the Ninth Amendment” — a reference to the mysterious outer region of a shadow cast by an opaque object. If that sounds like legal Gnosticism, it is — because only self-styled higher thinkers can reduce the Amendments to the U.S. Constitution to opaque objects casting faint shadows that only they can discern.

Over the past 46 years, the Pro-Life Movement has taken on a life of its own. It has become a political force to be reckoned with, especially within the Republican Party. And, while pro-abortion groups like Planned Parenthood still outpace the pro-life cause in fundraising and power within the Democratic Party, the culture has trended toward a pro-life position for several years.

Lost in the politically explosive issue of life is a historical and prophetic understanding of this stain on America’s soul.

The Historical Background

The “Wade” in the original case refers to Henry Wade, the District Attorney of Dallas County, Texas. He was tasked with defending the Texas statute prohibiting abortion against a legal steamroller determined to create a landmark case to impact the nation. That legal team actively sought a pregnant young woman to be the subject of their legal battle. They found her in Norma McCorvey — aka “Jane Roe.”

McCorvey was not what legal scholars would describe as a sympathetic litigant. The product of a troubled and sometimes violent childhood (she was repeatedly raped by a cousin over one three-week period), she was an abrasive, alcoholic drug user who was disowned by her own family. She already had two children by different men, and she had signed over both children for adoption. Pregnant for a third time and divorced at age 22, she sought an illegal abortion but found that all abortion clinics had been shut down by the authorities.

Eventually, McCorvey connected with a team of pro-abortion lawyers (headed by the daughter of a mainline minister) who realized that she could become the “victim” they had been looking for. They coached her to falsely claim she had been gang raped, hoping to make her circumstance more sympathetic. When her request for a legal abortion was denied due to lack of credibility, they ran her case for the next three years all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ironically, McCorvey never appeared in court and her third baby was born and given up for adoption. She later testified that the team of feminist lawyers never made an effort to help her after they secured her “Jane Roe” signature.

In the years that followed, Norma McCorvey became a high priestess of the same false religion that had used her and spit her out. She helped lure in young women to the Dallas abortion clinic where she worked for minimum wage and even comforted them with words she knew to be lies.

For a season, Norma basked in the notoriety. Caught up in the leftist feminist agenda, she declared herself to be an avowed lesbian. Anyone observing Norma McCorvey’s pro-abortion attitude and ungodly lifestyle would have declared her to be reprobate. But that is not the end of her story.

During her tenure as a committed lesbian and abortionist, pro-life activists from Operation Rescue began targeting her facility. Instead of screaming at Norma and the women who bought into the lies she helped spread, those intervening Christians primarily prayed and offered positive encouragement. They shined the light of truth and love where darkness seemed to prevail.

When I had the opportunity to meet Norma personally, she told me that what broke through her hardened heart was an 8-year-old girl named Emily Mackey who repeatedly told her, “Miss Norma, God loves you and so do I.” That simple statement made her realize that she had never experienced such grace and love — totally unexpected and undeserved. It melted her heart.

The other experience that caused her to reject the lie of abortion was seeing a baby on a modern ultrasound. No longer could she fool herself and others into believing the lie that a fetus is merely a clump of cells. What God miraculously knits together in each mother’s womb is fully human — from conception to birth.

A Radical Change of Life

In 1995, Norma McCorvey gave her life to Jesus Christ and renounced her former lifestyle and occupation. She later said:

Over the course of three decades, my life has changed and transformed. I live with the results of [the Roe v. Wade] decision every day. I breathed words that started a change; now I am breathing new words. I believe that God has brought me to this point to bring change once again.”

McCorvey became an outspoken advocate for life, which is how I met her. In 2008, she spoke at the annual “Kentucky Doctors for Life” dinner. As the leader of the Pro-Life Caucus in the Kentucky Legislature, I was asked to speak as well. I sat next to Norma and spent most of the evening thrilling at her testimony of how God changed her life and gave it eternally-relevant purpose and meaning.

Norma testified:

I love the Lord with all my heart and soul, [and] it’s beyond my comprehension that He can take someone like me who was a hippie and a drug addict and a fornicator and all the other stuff that I did and forgive me. It was so hard for me to conceive that the Lord had forgiven me — especially after so many children had been killed. But He has forgiven me and restored me.”

Where Our Nation Stands

There can be no doubt that our nation has bought into the lie of abortion. So many people worship at the altar of the false god of “choice” that the Democratic Party has made advocacy of unencumbered abortion a foundational tenet of its political platform. Ironically, the United States is joined only by North Korea and China in perpetuating the most liberal abortion laws in the world.

So dramatic is the darkening of hearts that rational thought is often impossible. During my re-election campaign in 2018, I stood on the doorstep of a self-professed witch and committed advocate of abortion who declared that an unborn child is not human “because that clump of cells could turn out to be a cauliflower.” I tried to explain to her that no human has ever given birth to a cauliflower, but she would not be moved.

So, just what is the historic and prophetic significance of this issue? I would submit that the insidious impact of progressive policies beginning not just in the 1960s and 70s, but going all the way back to the 1860s finally bore their unholy fruit in more recent years. Why the 1860s? Because that is when Charles Darwin asserted that life did not originate with God. Instead of Creation being a manifestation of God’s glory and design, he declared that life is an accident and that Mankind is descended from lower forms of life.

His evolutionary worldview is diametrically opposed to everything the Bible teaches. For a time, such ideas were confined to liberal universities and dismissed by the public at large as so much wind. But today, that false ideology has permeated our culture and is taught in every public classroom. And, once again, the evil seeds of such an ideology are bearing much destructive fruit in our society. After killing several classmates at Marshall County High School in Kentucky, the teenage murderer told police, “My life has no meaning, and neither does anyone else’s.” Is it any wonder that we are reaping the whirlwind?

Over the course of the past century, as America became more fixated with its growing material prosperity, we wandered away from the very God who poured out blessings upon us — individually and collectively. I am absolutely convinced that the immediate response of the Church in America to Supreme Court decisions banning prayer in schools and legalizing abortion on demand was a collective yawn. Many believers are finally waking up to the existential threat those and other secular policies represent, but we are playing catch up to the Devil.

Lately, Satan’s deceptive activity seems to have gone into overdrive. In January, the advocates of abortion doubled down on their agenda in New York. Not satisfied to have been known as the most pro-abortion state in the nation prior to 1973, Governor Andrew Cuomo and a conspiratorial legislature determined to push the abortion envelope once again. They passed legislation guaranteeing the legality of unrestricted abortion — literally up until the moment of live birth.

Governor Cuomo proclaimed that this would lock in unfettered abortion access in the Empire State just in case the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade. He gleefully celebrated this bold leap forward by ordering the Freedom Tower to be illuminated pink!

The Prophetic Significance

So, what of the prophetic significance? Scripture tells us what happens when a society abandons God and the truth He has revealed. Paul foretold of people who would know God, but not honor Him as God or give thanks. Inevitably, such a society is destined to become futile in its speculations and its foolish heart becomes darkened. Speaking of such people, Paul writes:

“Professing to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures. Therefore God gave them over…” (Romans 1:22-24a)

Certainly, as a recent edition of this magazine documented, our society has indeed been given over to lusts and impurity, degrading passions and a depraved mind (Romans 1:24-26). Many in our Christian nation are quick to condemn Adolf Hitler for murdering six million Jews but celebrate Cecile Richards (the former president of Planned Parenthood and daughter of former Texas governor Ann Richards) who proudly defended the murder of 60 million babies. How long will God, who condemned the abomination of sacrificing children to the false god Molech, tolerate our society sacrificing its children to the false god of choice?

The fact that our national foolish heart has become darkened — and that virtually every other “Christian nation” thinks likewise — is a dramatic sign that we are living in the last days. How else to describe the apostasy and lies that are embraced by people who ought to know better? God truly has given our nation over to a depraved mind.

Hoping for the Hopeless

How many Jane Roes do you know? I’m speaking of people who are living a lie, caught up in a false identity that tells them to reject biblical truth and the Gospel of Jesus Christ — individuals that nobody could realistically hold out hope for a change of mind, a melting of heart and an embracing of the Savior.

And yet, for Norma McCorvey-Jane Roe herself, who became the poster child for unfettered abortion and dedicated years of her life to perpetrating that lie — the grace of God still abounded. She was not beyond redemption and adoption into the family of God.

Sharing the Gospel message with such people might seem as futile as preaching to a set of dry bones. And yet, that is exactly what God commanded Ezekiel to do. Consider the apparent futility of that task. Preach to a valley full of bones so dry and scattered that hope is not even part of the equation. God certainly realized that from a human perspective such instruction must have seemed vain. That is why He asked Ezekiel, “Can these bones live?” In one of the greatest statements of faith-filled wisdom found in Scripture, Ezekiel correctly answered, “O Lord God, You know” (Ezekiel 37:3). Indeed, He did.

Only God knows how long He will withhold judgment on our nation. But the day of His wrath will certainly come if our nations persists in its stubborn rebellion against His Word. Romans 2:5 says, “…because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God.”

The great Battle Hymn of the Republic reflects the truth of Romans 2:5 and rightly foretells:

Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming
of the Lord; He is trampling out the vintage where
the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His
terrible swift sword;
His truth is marching on!

As Lamb & Lion Ministries proclaims the soon return of Jesus Christ, our goal is to pierce the hardened hearts of those who do not yet know Him as Savior and Lord. God the Father’s delay in sending His Son to gather His bride is a demonstration of His patience, grace, and love — allowing time for all who will believe to come to faith in Jesus (2 Peter 3:9).

We also want to motivate those who already know Jesus as Savior to allow Him to reign as Lord. That means dedicating ourselves to holy living and urgent evangelism. The Norma McCorveys of this world are lost in a world of deepening darkness, but we have Jesus — “the Light of men [that] shines in the darkness” (John 1:4-5).

Do you know Roe? Better question: Do you know Jesus, and if so, how many Roes can you introduce to Him?

We can combat the scourge of abortion — one life at a time. Satan wants to steal and kill and destroy. But Jesus came to give life (John 10:10). The same Savior who forgave and transformed abortion-seeking Jane Roe into Jesus-praising Norma McCorvey is coming soon and making all things new (Revelation 21:5).

Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!

Do You Know Roe? A Reflection on the Meaning of Life

This March for Life, we’re marching Roe right out the door

https://www.christianpost.com/voices/this-march-for-life-were-marching-roe-right-out-the-door.html

At this year’s March for Life, pro-life advocates have many reasons to be hopeful. More than 500 new pro-life bills were introduced in the U.S. in 2021, and 61 of those bills became law. Now this year, the Supreme Court has the chance to overturn 50 years of unconstitutional abortion precedent with their ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization later this year.

This ruling will determine the future of legal abortions in America. And based on the case’s oral arguments back in December, things are looking up for the pro-life cause. We’ve known since 1973 that Roe v. Wade needs to go, and arguments to the contrary from the justices at the Supreme Court hearing just don’t hold up.

Take Justice Sonia Sotomayor — she said that Roe v. Wade was an important legal precedent to keep because it had created an “entrenched set of expectations” in America: federally-protected access to abortions.

But here’s the thing: “Entrenched expectations” do not justify unconstitutional legal precedent, and they never have. The Supreme Court was never intended to be a direct expression of the will of the people. And what’s more, the Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey even admitted there will always be disagreement over legal abortion. Tens of thousands of Americans will attend the March for Life this year, refuting the idea that Roe v. Wade is an ironclad legal precedent in the eyes of Americans.

It’s time we put behind us the judicial regime established 50 years ago, no matter how long it has held sway over abortion law, no matter how “entrenched” expectations may be.

The court has clear guidelines for deciding when a previous law or ruling is subject to change or review; a poorly-reasoned decision is not worth defending just because it is precedent. Both Roe and Casey holdings rely on manifestly shoddy logic to manufacture non-existent rights. And not only are they poorly-constructed decisions, but they’re also blatantly unconstitutional.

Stare decisis refers to courts’ deference to previous rulings; it helps prevent arbitrary changes to existing law. But it never was an “inexorable command.” It should not be used to prop up egregious rulings. And both Roe and Casey established a set of legal precedents to which stare decisis simply should not apply.

Moreover, both Roe and Casey are indefensible instances of legislation from the bench. The Roe decision fabricated the constitutional right to abortion using the Fourteenth Amendment, asserting that a “right to privacy” was implied. The Casey decision claimed to support the “essential holdings” of Roe nearly 20 years later, but in fact, created an entirely new shoddy framework for determining the constitutionality of state abortion laws.

This is not jurisprudence, it’s activism. The Supreme Court has generated a series of confusing and nonsensical precedents that cooked up new “rights” and legal assumptions under the pretense of constitutional law.

States need a clear roadmap to craft abortion laws, but their efforts to do so are repeatedly struck down by justices under the Casey legal framework. The court must recognize states’ authority to legislate as they see fit. If they choose to protect the unborn, as Mississippi has done, they should be allowed to do so.

The court has an essential function as interpreter and upholder of constitutional and common law, and it has repeatedly corrected grave legal errors in the past. For instance, in Loving v. Virginia, the court overturned existing law barring interracial marriage. In Brown v. Board of Education, the court established racial segregation as unconstitutional. In none of these cases would it have been morally correct to consider the “expectations” of the time.

With Roe and Casey, the Supreme Court must once again reverse a bad legal precedent. The Dobbs case is a perfect opportunity for our sitting justices to critically re-examine both Roe and Casey, as well as the unconstitutional network of restrictions and rights these decisions established.

“Expectations” aren’t what’s at stake here. The Court’s function as an interpreter and upholder of constitutional and common law is what’s at stake.

It doesn’t matter that the Roe and Casey decisions have been the law of the land for half a century. They were poorly decided and resulted in a vast, confusing complex of unconstitutional law. It’s time for them to go.

Despite Justice Sotomayor’s comments, many Americans refuse to believe Roe should be settled law. They’ve marched by the tens of thousands in the dead of winter every year for 48 years, and they will be back in Washington this week this year with renewed hope.

Timothy Head is the executive director of the Faith and Freedom Coalition.

This March for Life, we’re marching Roe right out the door

How should a Christian view the Roe v. Wade decision?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Roe-vs-Wade.html

On January 22, 1973, in a decision known as Roe v. Wade, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a woman had a constitutional right to abort her baby. The ruling effectively legalized abortion nationwide. The Court found that a right of privacy was “broad enough to encompass” a right to abortion.

The case was titled Roe v. Wade after the parties involved. Norma McCorvey had sought an abortion in Dallas County, Texas, but was denied by Henry Wade, the district attorney at the time. In the ensuing court case, which traveled all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, Norma McCorvey was listed anonymously as Jane Roe; thus, the landmark battle became known as Roe v. Wade.

The Court ruled in favor of McCorvey and thus opened the door to legalized abortion nationwide. Roe v. Wade viewed pregnancy as divided into trimesters: in the first trimester, states were denied the right to ban or regulate abortion in any way. In the second trimester, states could enact some regulation, although abortions meant to protect maternal “health” had to be allowed. In the third trimester, a state could theoretically ban abortion, but laws had to allow for exceptions to preserve the life and “health” of the woman seeking the abortion. Issued on the same day, another case, Doe v. Bolton, defined health to mean “all factors” that affect the woman, including “physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age.” That definition effectively allowed all abortions for any reason.

The Supreme Court decision in favor of McCorvey was lauded by pro-abortion groups as a victory for women’s reproductive rights. One estimate of the number of legal abortions since the Roe v. Wade ruling is over 63 million (www.lifenews.com/2022/01/07/63459781-babies-have-been-killed-in-abortions-since-roe-v-wade-in-1973, accessed 6/27/22). Each one of those abortions was the killing of an innocent human life.

Roe v. Wade was indeed a great victory—for sexual immorality, for selfishness, and for those wishing to desensitize America to a culture of death. Most Christians viewed the Roe v. Wade decision with sadness and outrage. Christian and Catholic pro-life groups worked for years to reverse Roe v. Wade and to lessen the number of abortions—helping women in crisis pregnancies, engaging in public discourse, and supporting pro-life legislation.

The good news is that, with the Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, Roe v. Wade has been reversed. To be clear, the Dobbs ruling does not ban abortion but leaves the matter to individual states to deal with. In its decision on June 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court did two things, basically: it denied that there is a constitutional right to abortion (i.e., the Constitution does not mention abortion as a right) and handed the issue to the states to regulate. In doing so, the Court explicitly overturned Roe v. Wade and another case, Casey v. Planned Parenthood (1992).

The Bible provides a moral code upon which to build a framework of laws, jurisprudence, and executive action. That moral code is most readily found in the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20:1–17). The sixth of those commandments, “Thou shalt not kill,” is the one most directly related to the issue of abortion. Laws making abortion illegal conform to the moral code of the Bible in that they forbid the killing of an innocent human life. Roe v. Wade, which legalized the killing of innocent life, conflicted with the Bible’s moral code.

It is good for a country’s laws to reflect biblical morality: “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord” (Psalm 33:12). Now that Roe v. Wade has been overturned, it’s up to the states to pass laws protecting the pre-born and honoring biblical principles.

How should a Christian view the Roe vs. Wade decision?

(Got Questions Ministries)

What does it mean that Roe Vs. Wade has been overturned? How should Christians respond to Dobbs Vs. Jackson? Is enacting abortion laws something Christians should pursue? In this video, Pastor Nelson answers the question, “How should a Christian view the Roe vs. Wade decision”?

How should a Christian view the Roe v. Wade decision?

Abortion: It’s Beyond Politics

Abortion: It’s Beyond Politics :: By Howard Green

https://www.raptureready.com/2017/03/02/abortion-its-beyond-politics-by-howard-green/

The legalization of abortion in America set in motion one of the most polarizing issues to date. Every four years here in the U.S. the political battle lines are drawn and abortion is one of the main rallying points. While it’s true that a majority of people will fall into the political rank and file and vote along prevailing party lines, there is something much deeper happening below the surface.

Satan is at work doing what he does best. He is stealing, killing, destroying and is very much undeterred by the politics of the day. Let’s look past the marches and party lines and below the surface of the issue to the eternal damage being done in the name of choice.

Before we continue, please understand that I’m not advocating burying our heads in the sand as Christians and ignoring the politics surrounding the matter of abortion. On the contrary, we should always vote on the side of life and protecting the unborn. Moreover, we should vote to elect leaders who legislate from a pro-life foundation.

I’m not against pro-life marches and rallies and political action. I also understand that if we could overturn Roe v. Wade, the onslaught of abortions on demand would subside. The reality of the situation is that in the last forty-four years since Roe v. Wade, we have had republican and democrat administrations come and go.

Control of the Congress has gone back and forth, but the fact remains that regardless of who had political control, there has been well over 54 million babies aborted since 1973. I’ve heard talk of overturning Roe v. Wade and plans to defund the evil abortion mills that are Planned Parenthood for years but the babies are still being slaughtered by the thousands each week in the land of the free.

When we reduce the subject of abortion down to the basics what we find is a fundamentally spiritual issue.

Marches, signs, rallies all have their place, but the choice to terminate a pregnancy or not comes down to a person’s heart. For the sake of brevity, I don’t have the liberty of covering the downward spiral of Western society that began in earnest during the 1960s sexual revolution in detail but it exploded with the onset of so-called free love, women’s liberation, and the explosion of the illicit drug culture.

What was birthed in the 1960s has manifested into an increasingly godless society where almost anything goes. Common sense and rationality are increasingly scarce commodities and we’re living in a day when much of what is good is called evil and what is evil is called good.

Legislation and legislators come and go but the root cause of abortion remains. People have a heart problem and a person without Jesus is blinded by darkness. Can you imagine what would happen if more young men in the inner cities came to Jesus? They would marry their women and be at home to raise their children instead of leaving the mom and child to fend for themselves.

What would happen if more young women, especially in the inner cities came to saving faith in Jesus? Teen pregnancies would plummet and so would the cycle of abortion that follows. Abortion is common at every socio-economic level but I zeroed in on the inner cities because when abortion statistics are focused on urban areas, the numbers skyrocket.

It is beyond a shame and heartbreaking so many precious African-American babies are aborted. The numbers bear out that there is a wholesale slaughter of unborn African-American and Hispanic babies taking place. Who is going to talk to these young men and women in the inner cities about Jesus?

As believers, we must bring the Good News to these areas. The predominantly white suburbs aren’t left untouched by the horrors of abortion. Young women and men in the suburbs need to hear that there is free pregnancy help available and about salvation through Jesus because abortions take place here too.

In the real world, people make mistakes and sexual sin is often the result. When young men and women engage in sex outside of marriage, they are violating God’s laws. As a result, the protection of a God sanctioned relationship rooted in love is absent. In its place, you find self-gratification, abandonment, STDs, and unplanned or unwanted pregnancies.

Since these things happen, it’s important for Christians to speak the truth and offer hope even in these hard places. I often wonder what is going through the mind of a young lady who has just found our she’s pregnant. She is undoubtedly frightened, worried, and may feel completely hopeless. Sometimes we may have the opportunity to intervene with the good news before it comes to this point. In other cases, there is a baby involved and perhaps a young man who is still in the relationship.

Sin has consequences and leaves behind a trail of hurting people. These young women and men need practical help and hope. I have become dismayed as I’ve done my research because there is a lot of unplanned pregnancy resources thank God, but the spiritual resources and proclaiming of the gospel is much less apparent.

While it’s crucial we do all we can to save innocent babies from the abortion slaughterhouses, it’s also critical that we get this young mom and young man spiritual help if he’s around. We need to tell them about sin, coming judgment, repentance, and redemption through Jesus.

To do otherwise just makes us another social service and puts a temporary bandage on what is essentially a heart problem. If these young people don’t have God to answer to, many of them will go back out and repeat the process of promiscuity and head into eternity without Jesus.

Friends, I’m 100 percent all in for voting pro-life, getting our voice heard, and petitioning Washington until every abortion mill in America is shuttered, but first and foremost, we must get into the trenches and meet these people right where they are. This means going beyond the pro-life information table at church and our Statehouse steps. We need to get to these young people and let God open the doors.

This is why going to the highways and hedges is important. It might include street evangelism or possibly evangelizing in front of the abortion clinics. Witnessing to these people will look different for each of us but the end result will be God’s glory, saved unborn babies, and souls that have repented and come to Jesus.

I don’t condone the shrill combative shouting that has defined some pro-life efforts outside of abortion clinics. In its place, we should be willing to counsel, pray with, and witness to these women if God opens the door of opportunity. If you are unable to get out, you have the powerful weapon of prayer. Pray that these young women find Christ-centered help.

I want to remind everyone who reads this that God’s judgment is coming. I don’t know when, but it is as certain as His good name. America is going to have to answer for the millions of unborn babies that have been murdered. While many true men of God have stood up and defended the unborn, many cowardly hirelings haven’t done anything.

In August of 2000, thousands of pastors attended a Minister’s Leadership Conference at Willow Creek Church which is pastored by Bill Hybels. Not one of these cowards took a stand for the millions of unborn babies being murdered in America. In comments about President Clinton’s address and interview at the Pastor’s conference, Touchstone Journal’s executive editor James Kushner said, “The standing ovation given to the performance of a ruthlessly pro-abortion president marks the triumph of the personal over the moral for those Christian leaders.”

It’s worth noting again that former President Clinton left to the standing ovation of over 4,500 church leaders in attendance that day. Not one of them was willing to speak up for the unborn. I’m not advocating disrespect for authority or raucous behavior. I would have hoped that at least one of these supposed pastors or church leaders would have stood to his feet and respectfully challenged the president in regard to what the Bible says about life and warned of coming judgment on America because of the millions of abortions we have allowed. It’s a dark day when large numbers of pastors do nothing but acquiesce to the spirit of this age.

Judgment will certainly fall on America. This increasingly godless nation and other countries will have to answer for the lives of millions of innocent children. These babies have a nervous system that is developed by the 8th week and yes they do feel pain. One minute they are safe and warm in their mother’s womb and the next minute they are being sucked out and killed or torn apart by medical instruments among other barbaric methods. This is cruel, painful, and inhumane just as much as anyone endured in Rwanda, Siberia, or any other dark point in history we could list. This is all done in the name of freedom, choice, my body, and personal preference.

A report came out just a few weeks ago about a former abortion clinic worker. She stated that Planned Parenthood gives incentives for up-selling procedures. Add to this the nightmarish news that this “health” organization was engaged in the sale of fetal tissue and baby body parts, it is an unthinkable evil.

Let me close this article by reiterating the fact that we should vote pro-life and do all we can on the legislative end. In the meantime, while the barbaric act of abortion is still taking place daily, we need to evangelize, counsel, and help these women who are considering abortions. We also need to reach out to those post-abortive women and men who believed a lie. A lie that might have included thinking the baby was just skin tissue, they wouldn’t feel any pain, or they would forget about the procedure.

So many in the Church today are consumed with their own personal agenda, being relevant to the masses, giving pep-talks masquerading as sermons, and all the while say very little about coming judgment, repentance, and God’s holiness. The very fact that many so-called evangelical churches and leaders are ignoring what really matters is certainly an indicator of the nearness of the return of Jesus.

Please do all you can for the Lord while there is still time. There are so many hurting people out there. There are many young women who need to be directed to a Christian pregnancy center and need to know the saving power of Jesus. Abortion is beyond politics and although Satan comes to steal, kill, and destroy, Jesus came to give life. That’s beautiful news for moms and unborn babies. God bless you as you speak up for the unborn.

Unplanned pregnancy? If you are a young woman considering an abortion please know that you do have options. There are so many Christian agencies and ministries who will offer you free supplies such as diapers, maternity clothes, shelter and/or shelter assistance, love, and counseling. There is hope, peace, and forgiveness in Jesus name. Please click on the resources below for more information or contact us.

All for Him,

Howard

Concerning The Times Ministries

concerningthetimes.com

I have placed several links below to several excellent resources. Please take a moment and check them out. The first link is to Bethany Christian Services. The second is a video from Melody Green, the widow of the Late Keith Green. Although the video is a bit dated, she gives a bold presentation about the horrors of abortion. It is graphic, so view at your own discretion. The third link is to a pro-life advocacy group called Abort73. Blessings

Click here: Bethany Christian Services – Help for hurting women considering abortion. (worldwide)

Click here: Melody Green-Last Days Ministries pro-life video (Discretion is advised)

Click here: Abort73

The Abomination of Abortion - Are we courting the wrath of God? By Dr. David R. Reagan

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/the-abomination-of-abortion/

[read in Lamplighter (pdf)]

In January of 1973 the Supreme Court of the United States made one of its most momentous decisions. It has since proved to be its most infamous decision.

The Court ruled in the case of Roe v. Wade that states could not outlaw abortion. In effect, the Court authorized abortion on demand.

The Legal Grounds

Since there was no Constitutional basis for the decision, the justices invented a justification by proclaiming that they had discovered an implied “right of privacy.” They argued that this newly discovered right was sufficient to guarantee a pregnant woman freedom of choice regarding the destiny of the baby in her womb.

This incredible decision flew in the face of 4,000 years of Western civilization. It violated the fundamental tenets of America’s Judeo-Christian heritage. It contradicted the Hippocratic Oath that has guided the medical profession for centuries.

The decision also violated the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. That amendment specifies that “no person shall be denied life, liberty or property without due process of law.”

The justices got around this prohibition by declaring a baby in the womb to be a non-person, just as the Court ruled in 1856 in the notorious Dred Scott decision that Negroes were non-persons.

The Slaughter of the Innocent

The Court’s decision unleashed a holocaust of unprecedented proportions — a holocaust of babies.

Since 1973 Americans have been killing their babies at the rate of 4,000 per day, or 1 1/2 million per year. The 40th anniversary of the Court’s decision in 2013 will mark a total slaughter of almost 60 million babies. That’s ten times the death count of Hitler who murdered 6 million Jews.

In all the wars the United States has fought since the Revolutionary War — including the Civil War, World Wars I and II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — the number of Americans killed totals 848,163. We kill almost twice that many babies in America every year in the name “of freedom of choice for women.”

How many Beethovens have died? How many Shakespeares have been killed? How many Billy Grahams, Jonas Salks and Martin Luther Kings have been murdered in their mothers’ wombs?

The Nature of the Crime

Yes, I said, “murdered,” because the Word of God makes it clear that abortion is murder.

The Bible says that we are to “choose life” (Deuteronomy 30: 19). The abortionists choose death. The Bible says that God hates “hands that shed innocent blood” (Proverbs 6:17). The abortionists shed the blood of the innocent.

The abortionists say that the baby in the womb is not a human being. They dehumanize it by calling it a fetus or a “protoplasmic blob.” But God said to Jeremiah, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations” (Jeremiah 1:5).

These passages from God’s Word clearly teach that the baby in the womb is a human being from the moment of conception.

A Significant Confirmation

The humanity of the baby in the womb is confirmed in the New Testament in a story related to the birth of Jesus.

We are told in Luke 1:39-44 that when Mary became pregnant with Jesus, she went to see her relative Elizabeth who was pregnant with John the Baptist. When Mary came into the presence of Elizabeth, the Word says that the baby in Elizabeth’s womb leaped with joy over the presence of the Christ child who was yet to be born! Was Jesus a human being in His mother’s womb? Was John the Baptist?

God’s Word tells of a baby leaping with joy in his mother’s womb. All across America today we have babies writhing in agony as they burn to death in their mothers’ wombs from injected saline solutions.

A Perverted Value System

Our society has reached the same despicable level of degradation that characterized the ancient nation of Judah when God poured out His wrath upon them. The prophet Isaiah wrote of that nation: “Men call evil good and good evil” (Isa. 5:20). That’s where we are today.

Our nation is characterized by many grievous sins. For example, we are the moral polluter of planet earth through the exportation of our violent, immoral and blasphemous television programs and movies. We are also encouraging a plague of homosexuality worldwide. But our most horrible sin by far is the seal of approval that we have placed on the murder of babies in their mothers’ wombs. We have the blood of the innocent on our hands, and that blood is crying out for revenge.

As we have rejected God’s laws in favor of Man’s philosophical meanderings, we have perverted and distorted the Judeo-Christian value system that made this country so great. Our Humanistic values now reflect a perverse sense of priorities.

For example, we require parental consent for a girl to get her ears pierced. But she can get birth control pills and an abortion without anyone’s consent. We protect bald eagles and their eggs with stiff fines and prison sentences while we encourage people to kill their unborn babies. We weep over the killing of whales and rejoice over the slaughter of human babies.

Like the Nazis who dehumanized the Jews by calling them “vermin” and “parasites,” the abortion advocates have dehumanized the baby in the womb by calling it anything except a baby. To them the unborn child is “a chunk of tissue,” “gametic materials,” “fetal tissue,” or “protoplasmic rubbish.”

The widespread practice of abortion is desensitizing the American people to the value and dignity of life. This, in turn, is preparing us to accept the same atrocities which the Nazis committed — namely, infanticide and euthanasia. Both practices are becoming more common in this country and both are being advocated more and more openly.

After all, what is the difference in killing a baby in the womb a week before its scheduled delivery and killing it a week after it has been delivered? Why not give the parents a waiting period after delivery to decide if the baby should live? That way they could order it killed if it was the wrong sex, or had the wrong color of hair, or had a handicap of some sort.

And shouldn’t the same standard be applied to the elderly? Why should they be allowed to live if their “quality of life” becomes low due to illness or feebleness. Why should they be allowed to become a burden on the taxpayer?

It is certain that the acceptance of abortion will ultimately lead to the widespread practice of euthanasia. If parents can pay doctors to kill their unwanted children, then children will pay the same doctors to kill their unwanted parents. We reap what we sow (Gal. 6:7).

The Pros and Cons

I realize there are many sincere people, even professing Christians, who believe abortion should be a matter of personal choice. These people have developed many sophisticated arguments in behalf of abortion. But those arguments do not stand the test of Scripture or logic or experience.

1) “Is it fair,” the abortionists ask, “to bring a baby into the world who is unwanted?” This argument is an emotional deception. There is no such thing as an unwanted baby because there are hundreds of thousands of couples in America today who ardently desire to adopt a child.

2) “But what about rape victims?” the abortionists scream. Again, this argument is an emotional manipulation. Less than one percent of rape victims ever conceive, due probably to the trauma involved. But even in those situations where conception does occur, should the baby be killed for its father’s crime?

3) “But we must provide for the protection of the mother’s life,” argue the abortionists. But is this a valid issue? Consider these words by the former Surgeon-General of the U.S., Dr. C. Everett Koop:

Protection of the life of the mother as an excuse for an abortion is a smoke screen. In my 36 years of pediatric surgery, I have never known of one instance where the child had to be aborted to save the mother’s life. If toward the end of the pregnancy complications arise that threaten the mother’s health, the doctor will either induce labor or perform a Caesarian section. His intention is to save the life of both the mother and the baby. The baby’s life is never willfully destroyed because the mother’s life is in danger.

4) “But what about a deformed or retarded child? Shouldn’t it be aborted?” What about a child who becomes mentally retarded or blind at age six due to an illness or accident? Should that child be killed? How perfect must a person be in order to live? And who is to play God by making the decisions as to who lives and who dies?

5) “If abortion is outlawed again, tens of thousands will die from back-alley abortions performed by medically unqualified people.” In 1972, the year before the Court legalized abortion, it is estimated that there were about 500 abortions nationwide, resulting in 39 recorded deaths (see Dr. Bernard Nathanson’s book, Aborting America). We are killing 1 1/2 million babies per year right now, and hundreds of women die from the complications.

6) “But what about a woman’s right to privacy?” What about the baby’s right to life? Which right is more important? The right to privacy is a selfish right. The right to life is a God-given right. And if the privacy argument is going to prevail, should we then prohibit police from violating the privacy of a home to stop parents from abusing their children?

The Crucial Issue

The bottom line in all these arguments is whether or not the baby in the womb is a human being. If it is, as God’s Word teaches, then it should be accorded the full protection of our Constitution.

Why is an eagle in the egg considered to be an eagle, but a baby in the womb is not considered to be a human being? Even logic demands that we recognize the humanity of the unborn child.

Political Cowardice

President Reagan spoke out strongly against abortion, but he was never willing to expend his political energy to fight against it. President Bush also spoke out strongly against abortion in his first campaign, but he too refused to follow up his words with strong actions — and by the time of his second campaign, he was waffling on the issue. President Clinton became the first president in history to openly endorse the right of a woman to get an abortion on demand.

But President Clinton — the epitome of the slick politician — took the coward’s way out. He said he opposed abortion but believed in freedom of choice. Politicians all over the country jumped on that bandwagon, hoping it would placate both sides. This position of being anti-abortion but pro-choice is the ultimate cop-out.

The Slavery Parallel

It is equivalent to saying, “I am opposed to slavery, but I believe in the freedom of people to own slaves if they so desire.” I think it is interesting to note that this is exactly the position that most politicians took in this nation prior to the Civil War.

Lincoln stood above the run-of-the-mill politicians of his day precisely because he was willing to take a moral stand on the issue of slavery. On March 6, 1860, during the presidential campaign, he delivered a speech in New Haven, Connecticut in which he taunted those who claimed to be opposed to slavery but who believed in free choice:

Let us apply a few tests. You say that you think slavery is wrong, but you denounce all attempts to restrain it. Is there anything else that you think is wrong, that you are not willing to deal with as wrong?

You will not let us do a single thing as if it [slavery] is wrong . . . We must not call it wrong in politics because that is bringing morality into politics, and we must not call it wrong in the pulpit because that is bringing politics into religion . . . There is no single place, according to you, where this wrong thing can properly be called wrong.

Go back and substitute the word “abortion” for “slavery,” and you will have the current debate. Where among our political leaders is there a Lincoln who is willing to take a stand for what is right and then fight for it?

The Obama Administration

President Obama wasted no time making his position on abortion crystal clear. The day after his inauguration, he issued a statement affirming his support of the Roe v. Wade decision. The next day he rescinded the Mexico City Policy instituted by President Reagan, a policy that disallowed government funding to any non-government organization that promotes or performs abortions in foreign countries.

Since that time, Obama has done everything possible to promote abortion, including several attempts to overturn all conscience protections instituted by President Bush to make sure that medical staff and centers are not forced to do abortions.

None of these actions by Obama should have surprised anyone since he opposed all limitations on abortion when he was a state senator in Illinois. In 1997 he opposed a bill that would have prevented the horrible procedure known as “partial-birth abortion.” And in 2001 he was the only Illinois senator who spoke against a bill that was designed to protect babies born alive after botched abortions.

What Are We to Do?

First, we as Christians need to take a stand for righteousness. Our Savior has called us to be light and salt in the world (Matt. 5:13-14). We cannot stand by passively and allow the innocent to be murdered. Proverbs 24:11 says, “Rescue those who are unjustly sentenced to death; don’t stand back and let them die” (TLB).

Psalm 82:4 says, “Rescue the weak and needy; deliver them out of the hand of the wicked.” What could possibly be weaker than a baby in its mother’s womb? What could be more wicked than a medical doctor who perverts his life-saving skills by using them to kill babies?

Proverbs 31:8 says that we are to speak out for those who cannot speak for themselves, for those who are unfortunate. Amos 5:15 admonishes us to “hate evil, love good, and establish justice.”

Christians cannot be neutral about abortion. We must speak out against it. Some of us will be called of God to do more than that. God does not call all of us to do the same thing.

He may call you to be a soldier on the front lines who sits in the abortuary door and risks going to jail. He may call you to be a sidewalk counselor or an on-the-scene prayer warrior. He may call you to walk in a picket line or write letters to politicians or to newspapers. He may call you to adopt a child or to help establish or run a crisis pregnancy center. You do what God calls you to do.

A Word of Caution

God cannot be mocked (Gal. 6:7). He is going to deal with our sin of abortion. The Word says He is “slow to anger and great in power, and the Lord will by no means leave the guilty unpunished” (Nahum 1:3).

We are already experiencing the consequences of abortion.

They include a depreciation in the value of life and a corresponding increase in violent crime. Another consequence is a generation of women burdened with guilt and depression for their abortions. We are also missing a whole generation of young people who were aborted and who could now be living productive lives, paying the Social Security taxes necessary to support the very parents who killed them.

But the ultimate consequence is going to be the wrath of God, if we refuse to repent. This nation is crying out for judgment. We are kindling the wrath of God.

As in the days of Isaiah, “God looks for justice, but He sees bloodshed; He looks for righteousness, but He hears cries of distress” (Isa. 5:7). Therefore, “because we have rejected the law of the Lord Almighty and have despised the Word of the Holy One of Israel, the Lord’s anger burns against us and His hand will strike us down” (Isa. 5:24-25).

The hand of God can be stayed only by our repentance. We must roll back the abominable decision of the Supreme Court. It must be overturned, just as the Dred Scott decision was ultimately invalidated. So, speak out, pray, and write to your political representatives. Choose life!

A Word of Comfort

I want to conclude with a word of comfort for those who have had an abortion. God hates what you did, but He loves you. He is willing to forgive and forget if you will repent of your sin and receive His Son as your Savior.

In a remarkable passage in 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, Paul says that the church in Corinth was full of former fornicators, idolaters, homosexuals, drunkards and swindlers. But, Paul proclaims that they had been washed, sanctified and justified before God through their repentance and acceptance of Jesus as their Savior. Read this passage and then turn to Romans 8:1 and rejoice in the promise that “there is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.”

The Abomination of Abortion - Are we courting the wrath of God?

A Thought about Abortion - Would you consider abortion in the following four situations?

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/a-thought-about-abortion/

There’s a preacher and wife who are very, very, poor. They already have 14 kids. Now she finds out she’s pregnant with her 15th. They’re living in tremendous poverty. Considering their poverty and the excessive world population, would you consider recommending she gets an abortion?
The father is sick with sniffles, the mother has TB. They have 4 children. the 1st is blind, the 2nd is dead, the 3rd is deaf and the 4th has TB. She finds she’s pregnant again. Given the extreme situation, would you consider recommending abortion?
A white man raped a 13 year old black girl and she got pregnant. If you were her parents, would you consider recommending abortion?
A teenage girl is pregnant. She’s not married. Here fiancee is not the father of the baby, and he’s very upset. Would you consider recommending abortion?

Answers

If you have answered “yes” in any of these situations:

In the first case, you have just killed John Wesley. One of the great evangelists of the 19th century.
In the second case, you have killed Beethoven.
In the third case, you have killed Ethel Waters, the great black gospel singer.
If you said yes to the fourth case, you have just declared the murder of Jesus Christ!

Something to think about and pass along.

A Thought about Abortion - Would you consider abortion in the following four situations?

Vatican Invites Pro Abortion “Population Bomb” Author To Speak

Vatican Invites Pro Abortion “Population Bomb” Author To Speak :: by Geri Ungurean

https://www.raptureready.com/2017/01/16/vatican-invites-pro-abortion-population-bomb-author-to-speak-by-geri-ungurean/

No – this is NOT fake news.

Since Roe Vs. Wade was passed in 1973, the Catholic Church has been at the forefront of the Pro-Life movement. In a drastic change of heart, the Vatican has invited Dr. Paul Ehrlich, whom many call the father of the population control, pro-abortion movement, to present a paper and to speak at a Vatican-run conference.

From lifesitenews.com (my comments indented in blue)

Pro-abort ‘Population Bomb’ author to speak at Vatican

VATICAN CITY, January 12, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has invited the undisputed father of the modern, pro-abortion population control movement to present a paper at an upcoming Vatican-run conference.

Dr. Paul Ehrlich, author of the 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb is scheduled to speak in Vatican City during the February 27-March 1 conference that will discuss “how to save the natural world.” The Stanford biologist champions sex-selective abortion as well as mass forced sterilization as legitimate methods to curb population growth.

In his 1968 book, Ehrlich went so far as to defend forced abortion, writing: “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

This man is pushing eugenics, and he doesn’t care how heartless the process has to be. Forced abortion? Compulsory population control laws? And he will be speaking to an audience from the Vatican. Unreal. We know that Pope Francis is a spokesperson for Climate Change, so should we really be so shocked?

Titled Biological Extinction, the February conference will address what Vatican organizers call an unsustainable “imbalance” between the world’s population and what the earth is capable of producing. The event is jointly sponsored by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.

Organizers of the Vatican-run conference predict that if effective steps are not taken to reverse so-called man-made “global climate change,” then up to 40 percent of “all biodiversity on Earth” will be destroyed “by the end of this century,” including a “majority” of species of plants.

The Vatican conference is titled “Biological Extinction.” Pope Francis certainly wears many hats. Marxism, globalism, Climate change, and now (believe it or not) Eugenics! And please notice that the conference is quite concerned about the destruction of certain species of plants! We NEVER hear the Gospel of Jesus Christ from these people. That is because Catholicism is a cult – it is NOT Christianity.

“[T]here is no possibility of improving our situation without the widespread adoption of social justice, both as a matter of morality and as a matter of survival,” the event brochure put out by the Vatican states.

With the invitation of Ehrlich to address the conference, how the Pontifical Academies understand “social justice” takes on a sinister aspect.

Social Justice? And it says that the Vatican authorities understand that “social justice” takes on a sinister aspect. They are right about that! What can be more sinister than slaughtering the innocent unborn child in the womb of his/her mother?

In The Population Bomb, Ehrlich forecasted “an utter breakdown in the capacity of the planet to support humanity” that would result in starvation for hundreds of millions, predictions that have proved to be false while his theories have been debunked. The biologist predicted in 1968 that half of Americans would die by 1990. India and China would simply die out. By the year 2000, England would also cease to exist. Ehrlic mentioned in his book sex-selection abortion as a potentially effective tool for conserving the world’s resources by reducing population, a position he continues to defend.

This man is obviously a fraud and is in this for the money. Isn’t it always about money?

In a 2011 interview with Mara Hvistendahl, Ehrlich defended sex-selection abortion, stating that “it would be a good idea to let people have their choice so that they could have fewer children and could have what they wanted,” adding that a sex-selection abortion and possibly even infanticide might be a better fate for females than what awaited them in an overpopulated world.

Infanticide? Can you say MONSTER?

“You can be aborted as a conceptus, you can be killed at birth, or you can be sold into slavery and die in a slum someplace,” he said. “It would be interesting to know how many females you’re keeping out of hideous situations [when they are not] killed or infanticided.”

In the same interview, Ehrlich also defended the principle behind mass forced sterilization, a concept mentioned in a 1977 book he co-authored titled Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, suggesting that mass sterilization working in tandem with sex-selection technology would be particularly effective for population control interests.

I am at a loss for words after reading the last two paragraphs. Are we back in Nazi Germany?

Steven Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, criticized the Vatican’s choice of Ehrlich as a suitable speaker.

“Ehrlich’s opinions on biological extinction rates are just as exaggerated as his failed predictions of a human population explosion. Why the Vatican should be giving a platform to this secular prophet of doom is beyond me,” he told LifeSiteNews.

I could not agree more!

“There are plenty of credible Catholic scientists around whose fact-based opinions should be highlighted by their Church. What’s next? Inviting Raúl Castro to speak on human rights?” he added.

The Catholic Church not only condemns abortion but coercive population control methods as well.

Instead of seeing people as “mouths to feed,” “pollution producers,” or “carbon footprint makers,” the Church sees each person as a unique and unrepeatable gift from God.

And how about the souls of people? God cares about our souls!

In his watershed 1968 Encyclical Humanae Vitae that taught about the moral evil of using contraception to space birth, Pope Paul VI warned rulers of countries against using illicit methods of birth control to solve the “demographic problem.”

“Do not allow the morality of your peoples to be degraded; do not permit that by legal means practices contrary to the natural and divine law be introduced into the fundamental cell, the family,” he urged at that time.

Paul VI warned the people of the world then that if contraception became a societal norm it would provide governments with a “dangerous weapon” to manipulate population sizes.

“Who will stop rulers from favoring, from even imposing upon their peoples, if they were to consider it necessary, the method of contraception which they judge to be most efficacious? In such a way men, wishing to avoid individual, family, or social difficulties encountered in the observance of the divine law, would reach the point of placing at the mercy of the intervention of public authorities the most personal and most reserved sector of conjugal intimacy,” he wrote.

Pope Francis has also explicitly rejected population control as a method to combat climate change, writing in his encyclical Laudato Si’ that to “blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some [for lack of resources] is one way of refusing to face the issues.”

Given the Church’s outright condemnation of abortion, contraception, and the use of coercive population control measures to curb demographics, it remains to be seen why the Pontifical Academies viewed the famed proponent of population control as a suitable speaker for their conference.

Something is very wrong with this picture. I am wondering if Pope Francis is not being up front with his own eugenics agenda.

This is not the first time an advocate for positions contrary to the Catholic faith has been invited to attend Vatican conferences. The leaders of both Pontifical Academies have, under Francis’ pontificate, surprisingly given prominent platforms to some of the world’s foremost proponents of abortion and population control, including Ban Ki-moon and Jeffrey Sachs.

In 2015, Professor Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, slammed the Centre for Family and Human Rights Institute (C-Fam), an American pro-life research institute that monitors the United Nations, after it raised concerns about abortion and population control proponents being given a platform at a Vatican conference on climate change. “I am appointed by the Pope and responsible directly to him. I’m afraid that leaves you and your cohort out in the cold,” she told the organization at that time.

Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, also has a history of inviting abortion and population control proponents to Vatican events. He has been criticized by pro-life advocates for unreservedly endorsing the United Nations’ controversial Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which pro-lifers warn include a not-so-hidden abortion and population control agenda. Last year, Sorondo defended inviting then-Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, an abortion advocate, to address a “social order” conference.

Also attending the Vatican conference is African Cardinal Peter Turkson, who in a BBC interview in 2015 said “birth control” could “offer a solution” to the impacts of climate change. Turkson, who has since become the prefect of the Dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development, later revised his statement, saying that when he used the term “birth control,” what he actually meant was spacing of births or “responsible parenthood.” – source

What the African Cardinal Peter Turkson” actually means” is to provide enough abortion clinics to ensure that women have only so many children. It amazes and disgusts me that countries from Africa would not discern that the U.N. and other Globalist organizations are attempting to drastically cut back the population of third world countries. Instead of helping them to advance economically – their plan is to implement eugenics.

“For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies” (Matthew 15:19).

MARANATHA!

grandmageri422@gmail.com

COVID-19 Genocide of 2020

The virus was made for the vaccine, NOT the vaccine for the virus

The Covid-19 Genocide of 2020

http://ageoftruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/The-COVID-19-Genocide-2020.pdf

Exposing Vaccine Genocide https://exposingvaccinegenocide.org/

“The Vaccine Genocide Chronicles: Part 4: Covert use of Abortion-causing Vaccines Around the World.” https://www.vaccinesandchristianity.org/2019/04/16/the-vaccine-genocide-chronicles-part-4- covert-use-of-abortion-causing-vaccines-around-the-world/

10 Stages of Genocide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_stages_of_genocide

https://genocideeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ten_stages_of_genocide.pdf

The Stanton paper was presented at the State Department in 1996, shortly after the Rwandan genocide, but it also analyzes the processes in the Holocaust, the Cambodian genocide, and other genocides. The preventive measures suggested are those that the United States, national governments, and United Nations could implement or influence other governments to implement.

Barbara Marx Hubbard

Co-founder and president of the Foundation for Conscious Evolution
Theorized that humanity was on the threshold of a quantum leap
“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.”

UNESCO Interview with Jacques-Yves Cousteau

"Getting rid of viruses is an admirable idea, but it raises enormous problems. In the first 1,400 years of the Christian era, population numbers were virtually stationary. through epidemics, nature compensated for excess births by excess deaths. I talked about this problem with the director of the Egyptian Academy of Sciences. He told me that scientists were appalled to think that by the year 2080 the population of Egypt might reach 250 million. What should we do to eliminate suffering and disease? It’s a wonderful idea but perhaps not altogether a beneficial one in the long run. If we try to implement it we may jeopardize the future of our species. It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn't even say it. but the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable."

COVID-19 Genocide of 2020

10 Stages of Genocide

WEF Adviser Yuval Harari: ‘We Just Don’t Need the Vast Majority of the Population’ in Today’s World

https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2022/08/10/wef-adviser-yuval-harari-we-just-dont-need-the-vast-majority-of-the-population-in-todays-world/

Yuval Noah Harari’s futurist view is that humans are increasingly useless as automation, AI and robots take over human functions. This is the driving view for depopulation to simply remove those “useless eaters” from the face of the earth. Harari is a principal advisor to Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. ⁃ TN Editor

Yuval Noah Harari, historian, futurist, and World Economic Forum (WEF) adviser, said, “We just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in the early 21st century given modern technologies’ rendering human labor economically and militarily “redundant.”

Harari’s remarks were made in an interview with Chris Anderson, the head of TED, published on Tuesday. He assessed widespread contemporary disillusionment among “common people” as being rooted in a fear of being “left behind” in a future run by “smart people.” Such fears are justified, he added, given his projection that emerging technologies will displace economic needs to many categories of existing work:

A lot of people sense that they are being left behind and left out of the story, even if their material conditions are still relatively good. In the 20th century, what was common to all the stories — the liberal, the fascist, the communist — is that the big heroes of the story were the common people, not necessarily all people, but if you lived, say, in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, life was very grim, but when you looked at the propaganda posters on the walls that depicted the glorious future, you were there. You looked at the posters which showed steel workers and farmers in heroic poses, and it was obvious that this is the future.

Now, when people look at the posters on the walls, or listen to TED talks, they hear a lot of these these big ideas and big words about machine learning and genetic engineering and blockchain and globalization, and they are not there. They are no longer part of the story of the future, and I think that — again, this is a hypothesis — if I try to understand and to connect to the deep resentment of people, in many places around the world, part of what might be going there is people realize — and they’re correct in thinking that — that, ‘The future doesn’t need me. You have all these smart people in California and in New York and in Beijing, and they are planning this amazing future with artificial intelligence and bio-engineering and in global connectivity and whatnot, and they don’t need me. Maybe if they are nice, they will throw some crumbs my way like universal basic income,’ but it’s much worse psychologically to feel that you are useless than to feel that you are exploited.

Harari contrasted the 20th century with the 21st while forecasting what he said is the current century’s and future economies progressively diminishing need for human beings. He said:

If you go back to the middle of the 20th century — and it doesn’t matter if you’re in the United States with Roosevelt, or if you’re in Germany with Hitler, or even in the USSR with Stalin — and you think about building the future, then your building materials are those millions of people who are working hard in the factories, in the farms, the soldiers. You need them. You don’t have any kind of future without them.

“Now, fast forward to the early 21st century when we just don’t need the vast majority of the population,” he concluded, “because because the future is about developing more and more sophisticated technology, like artificial intelligence [and] bioengineering, Most people don’t contribute anything to that, except perhaps for their data, and whatever people are still doing which is useful, these technologies increasingly will make redundant and will make it possible to replace the people.”

WEF Declares 'We Just Don’t Need The Vast Majority of You' (NORTHAMERICANNEWS01)

Top World Economic Forum (WEF) adviser Yuval Noah Harari recently declared that the WEF considers the vast majority of the human population to be obsolete, useless and redundant.

Harari, known as Klaus Schwab’s right hand man, made the disturbing comments in an interview with Chris Anderson, head of the TED media group, echoing past predictions of a “useless class” of “obsolete” and “unemployable” humans.

According to Harari, so-called “common people” are right to be fearful of a future in which they will be made “redundant”.

The WEF advisor assessed the widespread anxiety among “common people” as being rooted in a fear of being “left behind” in a future run by “smart people.”

Such fears are justified, according to Harari, who spoke on behalf of the elites and confirmed “We just don’t need the vast majority of you.”

Harari’s extraordinary remarks serve as the strongest warning yet that Klaus Schwab’s WEF is intent on depopulating the world.

We all know about Bill Gates’ plans. But he’s far from the only one. Speaking at a panel discussion called “Securing a Sustainable Future for the Amazon,” Jane Goodall discussed her Trillion Trees Project, part of her effort to protect and restore forests to help the climate.

According to Goodall, there are simply too many human beings in the world and human population growth must be dealt with by the powers that be. You will be able to see the full context of her statements in the video in a moment, but she finished with:

“We cannot hide away from human population growth, because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn’t be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.”

They are not even trying to hide their plans anymore.

For the record, the global population 500 years ago was around 500 million. The global population today is just under 8 billion. In order to return to global population levels of 500 years ago, approximately 7.5 billion people would have to die.

That’s about 94% of the world’s population. Is this their plan?

WEF Adviser Yuval Harari: ‘We Just Don’t Need the Vast Majority of the Population’ in Today’s World

Georgia Guidestones

The Georgia Guidestones are a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages (English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian) and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts. The message on the stones consists of 10 guidelines to which the citizens of planet Earth should adhere to in order to achieve and maintain global stability.

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

These Georgia Guidestones list Satan's agenda:

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
- What happens to the other 7.5 billion people? COVID 'vaccine'
- See Deception - COVID-19 Plandemic and One-World Government - Agenda 21
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
- Abortion
- Genetic Manipulation
- Sexual Immorality = No procreation
Unite humanity with a living new language.
- Like at the Tower of Babel that God condemned
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
- One-World Religion of tolerance
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
- One-World Government
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
- One-World Government
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
- Eliminate police
- Lawlessness
Balance personal rights with social duties.
- Social justice 'gospel' of the One-World Religion
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
- Mother Earth 'gospel' of the One-World Religion
Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
- See point #1 - Decrease human population by >90%
- Religion of Mother Earth

What's the World Coming To? J.D. Farag

Start at 6:03 for the Revelation One-World System

and 11:58 for the connection to the Georgia Guidestones

Ten Commandments Of Satan Destroyed! The_Watchman_1963

Dark Clouds Over Elberton

The True Story of the Georgia Guidestones

(jwracing77)

"A recently released documentary reveals that R.C. Christian, a pseudonym for the man who provided the designs and funding for the controversial Georgia Guidestones monument, was Herbert Hinie Kersten, a doctor from Fort Dodge, Iowa. Kersten appears to have expressed support for David Duke, former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, in a letter written to the South Florida Sun Sentinel. William Sayles Doan, an author and Fort Dodge historian, claims on camera that Kersten was an outspoken racist who voiced plans to create a measurement to definitively prove that whites – and in particular Northern Europeans – were the world’s superior race.

Kersten was aided by his friend, Robert Merryman, publisher of the Ft. Dodge Messenger. Merryman is known to have arranged the publication of Common Sense Renewed, a book intended to explain the purpose of the Georgia Guidestones.

The Georgia Guidestones

(Prophecy Watchers w/ Chris Pinto)

Join Mondo and filmmaker Chris Pinto for an update on the Georgia Guidestones. They delve into the history of the guidestones, the moral implications of the guidelines, and the current state of the monument today.

Georgia Guidestones

The Georgia Guide Stones and the Ten Commandments of the Coming Antichrist

https://grandmageri422.me/2015/07/30/the-georgia-guidestones-and-the-10-commandments-of-the-coming-antichrist-video/

The Ten Commandments of the Coming Antichrist Revealed

In 1980, a very strange stone formation was erected in a city in Georgia. It has been called the Stonehenge of America. Its name is the Georgia Guidestones.

“The Georgia Guidestones is a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages, and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs.

elberton-georgia-guidestones-r-c-christian-10-commandments-antichrist-new-world-order-nwo.

The monument stands at the highest point in Elbert County, about 90 miles (140 km) east of Atlanta, 45 miles (72 km) from Athens, and 9 miles (14 km) north of the center of Elberton. The stones are visible from Georgia Highway 77 (Hartwell Highway) and are reached by turning east on Guidestones Road. The structure is sometimes referred to as an “American Stonehenge”. The monument is 19 feet 3 inches (5.87 m) tall, made from six granite slabs weighing 237,746 pounds (107,840 kg) in all. One slab stands in the center, with four arranged around it. A capstone lies on top of the five slabs, which are astronomically aligned. An additional stone tablet, which is set in the ground a short distance to the west of the structure, provides some notes on the history and purpose of the Guidestones.”

Here are the 10 guidelines (Commandments) etched in the stones:

Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature

The first one should alarm the normal person. We have over 7 billion people on the earth right now. To be in “Perpetual balance with nature” 9 out of 10 people would have to be eliminated!

The second one no doubt has to do with sterilization and abortion

The third is extremely interesting- Unite humanity with a living new language. Remember when God stopped the construction of the Tower of Babel by confusing the languages?

The fourth is a big problem for Christians – tempering our faith – very telling.

The sixth speaks of a World court. Brings to mind a One World Government.

The ninth sounds very Wiccan and New Age.

The tenth reinforces the first – speaking of people as of little worth, a cancer upon the earth.

Mother Earth is in the end— most important.

So, the new 10 commandments are all for the good of the earth. They are worshiping the creation and ignoring the Creator. We can look at the Bible and clearly see that everything Satan did was contrary to God’s Word. He started in the Garden of Eden, speaking lies to Eve so that she would doubt that which God had spoken to her.

But we need to go back to the beginning to truly understand Satan’s mission here on earth. When he was still Lucifer, the most beautiful of all of God’s created angels, he became jealous of God and sought to sit on God’s throne instead of Him.

God knew the intent of Lucifer’s heart, and because of his arrogance and pride, he was cast out of heaven, along with 1/3 of the angels who chose to follow him.

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.” Isaiah 14:12-15 (KJV)

“And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Revelation 12:7-9 (KJV)

THE GARDEN OF EDEN

“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.” Genesis 3:1-6 (KJV)

Clever and crafty is the evil one. I believe that the New Age movement is actually not “new” at all. I think that it was born the moment that Satan said to Eve that God knew if she and Adam ate from the forbidden tree, that they would be as gods. He appealed to the rebellious and prideful side of Eve. She desired wisdom. She desired to be a god. She and Adam had been created by God with free will to choose good or evil. God had placed Adam and Eve in the most perfect setting. A beautiful garden, where they could walk and talk with Him. They had everything they would ever need. All they had to do was to obey Him.

Satan has been present throughout human history. If people are not following God, then they are following the devil. Some would say that is not true. They would say that a person has the right to choose to go their own way. Yes, God gave them that right. But since God created all people, does He not have the right to ask for their devotion and obedience?

“But now, O Lord, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.” (Isaiah 64:8)

THE TEN COMMANDMENTS OF GOD

“And God spake all these words, saying, I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.

Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:

But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.

Thou shalt not kill.

Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Thou shalt not steal.

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.”Exodus 20:1-17 (KJV)

It seems that from the beginning of time, people wanted to worship that which they could see. Not only that, but they wished to fashion these graven images with their own hands. When Moses was on Mount Sinai, receiving the law of God, written with His own finger, the people were busily making a golden calf.

They stood back and admired the work of their own hands, and then they worshiped it. This angered Moses to the point of smashing the tablets on which God had written His law.

God in His mercy, wrote the Commandments again for Moses to take to the people.Moses spent 40 days and 40 nights in the presence of the Lord. When he descended the mountain, the people could not look upon the face of Moses, because the brightness of the Glory of God shone from his face. He actually had to place a veil over his face when he was with the people, which he removed when he went back into the presence of God.

I think that it was merciful of God to allow the Shekinah Glory to shine from Moses for the people to see. The Lord God knew that these people whom He loved were weak, and needed a sign. How much greater was the Shekinah glory of God on Moses’ face, than the glimmer of the golden calf which they had made with their own hands?

God also knew that people would not be able to keep His whole law. He gave us His law to show His standards — His holiness, His righteousness, His perfection. In His incredible love and mercy towards us, He sent His only Son, Jesus, to pay the penalty for our sins, and in turn He gave those who believed, the righteousness of Jesus, so that we might be reconciled to Himself.

“There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” Romans 8: 1-4 (KJV)

NEW AGE FOLLOWERS

Remember when Satan spoke to Eve about being as gods? Those powerfully tempting words brought about the fall of Adam and Eve, and so the rest of us. Satan and his demons love to whisper lofty words into the ears of unsuspecting people.

Those whom God has redeemed learn to discern when the devil is speaking lies to us. Sometimes, when we are weak, we stumble and fall, before we realize that our enemy has tripped us up. Thankfully, the Word says:

“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” 1 John 1:9 (KJV)

But those who have not been redeemed are following after the devil. Some just call it “doing their own thing.” But some consciously follow evil and do it unapologetically.

I wrote an article about the United Nations and the Lucis Trust not long ago. This satanic organization was birthed by a woman named Alice Bailey, a known occultist and spiritist. Through her work, the New Age philosophies permeated the United Nations, and to this day is their “religion.”

Bailey wrote extensively about waiting for Lord Maitreya, whom anyone associated with the New Age movement knows is their messiah. He is known to Christians throughout the world as Antichrist.

WICCA, WITCHCRAFT, OCCULTISM AND NEO-PAGANISM

Wicca: From the Anglo-Saxon word wicce. It means to bend or shape nature to your service.

Witchcraft: The practice of magic or sorcery by anyone outside the religious mainstream of a society. This term is used in different ways in different times and places.

Occultism: Belief in practices such as astrology, alchemy, divination and magic that are based on “hidden knowledge” about the universe and its mysterious forces. Occultists try to tap into this unseen knowledge to bring about whatever effects they desire.

Neo-Paganism: The recent revival of ancient polytheistic European and Middle-Eastern religions. Neo-paganism is a loosely defined system of worshiping nature and the gods of nature.

Did you notice that “nature” is mentioned a lot? That’s because the people who participate in these practices, worship the earth — actually they call earth “Mother earth.”

If you asked these people about Satan, most all of them would tell you that they don’t believe in him. These sects of occultism are different from Satanists. Their “god” is nature and our planet.

Now, although they do not speak of Satan, you will find many who talk about Lucifer. Alice Bailey and other occultists in the U.N. believe that Lucifer is to be exalted and revered. To them, he is a source of enlightenment and the first “rebel” which they see as righteous, and a wonderful role model.

GLOBAL WARMING AND CARING FOR MOTHER EARTH

Are you beginning to see from where the millions of ‘Save the earth’ people emerge? They are doing what anyone who worships the earth would do, right? They have absolutely no time for Christians, who speak of sin, repentance and trusting in Jesus Christ for forgiveness of sins.

But you WILL hear them speak of THE Christ. Please know that this is NOT our Savior Jesus Christ of whom they speak. There are many terms for the one for whom they wait. Lord Maitreya is one name. Even though these people say that do not believe in Satan, they would be shocked to know that they all were fooled by him, and they ARE following him.

“Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.”Romans 1:21-23 (KJV)

The Mother Earth worshipers believe that the earth and the animals are worth much more than people. As a matter of fact, most of them are on board with population control. ANYTHING to help Mother Earth to be all she can be! I joke, but it’s very sad.

It’s especially sad when you think that all of these people who have worshiped God’s creation instead of Him, the Creator, will be in hell when they die, if they don’t repent of their beliefs.

We are definitely in the last of the last days. We are waiting for the Blessed Hope — the Lord Jesus catching those of us who love Him, away from this wicked earth, and He will take us to heaven to be with Him forever.

Those who are worshiping the earth, believe that a messiah is coming. I have very bad news for them. He is no messiah and he is EVIL incarnate. If they didn’t believe in Satan before, they will meet him face to face in Antichrist. Such a terrifying thought, and they have absolutely no clue that this is what will happen.

Keep this article in mind when you watch Pope Francis give his global warming speech at the UN in September. I believe that the Lord will open the eyes of many people that day – especially when he speaks of the earth as “Mother Earth.”

MARANATHA!!

The Georgia Guide Stones and the Ten Commandments of the Coming Antichrist

Hasten The Day!

Prophecies Happening NOW EUGENICS, ABORTION & GENOCIDE

Eugenics, If You Think That This Ended With Hitler – Think Again :: by Geri Ungurean

Bill Gates, His Father and Eugenics :: By Geri Ungurean

Insects As Flying Syringes For Genetic Modification, Eugenics And Population Control

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Project “Insect Allies”

​

Objections From the Scientific Community and Even the Pre-2020 Media

​

“Horizontal Environmental Genetic Alteration Agents”

​

“Project Coast”

​

Back to DARPA

​

Living Foundries

​

“Programming Biological Systems”

​

DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office

​

Remote-Controlled Insects

​

About the Author

​

Related Articles:

Canada Begins Eugenics Program

Canadian retailer Simons glamorizes assisted suicide as ‘The Most Beautiful Exit’

How Abortion and Transgenderism = Depopulation :: By Geri Ungurean

A Brief History of Margaret Sanger

​

Margaret Sanger’s Eugenics

Margaret Sanger and Abortion

​

Margaret Sanger and Racism

​

Do You Know Roe? A Reflection on the Meaning of Life By Tim Moore

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/do-you-know-roe/

The Historical Background

​

A Radical Change of Life

​

Where Our Nation Stands

​

The Prophetic Significance

​

Hoping for the Hopeless

​

How should a Christian view the Roe v. Wade decision?

Abortion: It’s Beyond Politics :: By Howard Green

The Abomination of Abortion - Are we courting the wrath of God? By Dr. David R. Reagan

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/the-abomination-of-abortion/

The Legal Grounds

​

The Slaughter of the Innocent

​

The Nature of the Crime

​

​

A Significant Confirmation

​

A Perverted Value System

​

The Pros and Cons

​

The Crucial Issue

​

Political Cowardice

​

The Slavery Parallel

​

The Obama Administration

​

What Are We to Do?

​

A Word of Caution

​

A Word of Comfort

​

Prophecies Happening NOW
EUGENICS, ABORTION & GENOCIDE